The Rolling Pebbles

Stationary stone?

How much is Slack paying you :):)

is it a fancy LLM? and is it something that provides useful and relevant feedback? how is it being trained to do that? and is there a non-deli paper that describes said process of training?

I don't know if it is. Presumably the ICML organizers do. The structure of these interventions is basically to address "authors as DDOS attack on ICML" :), with the hope that this will free up reviewers.

The new policy on deli papers (aka thinly sliced:)) seems quite strong and new. I wonder how it will play out. In brief, authors have to disclose all papers they are submitting as prior work to the one under review. I'm also not encouraged by the "use our LLM to review your work"

I am seen.

given the way fast bowlers are breaking down, I'd guess they are NOT using PEDs because that's one value add there - for recovery from injury (unlike the EPO stuff that seems cycling specific)

This is beginning to sound like an episode of Wait Wait Don't tell me where you have to identify the true news story from the fake ones :)

Not sure why that would help. Some amount of adrenaline is a good thing for a batsman :)

One aspect of SVMs that are enduring is the idea of high dimensional representations that allow for simple classifiers. You see a lot of that emerging in LLM land as well.

Yes. A standard measure might be the ranking distance (number of swaps needed to go from one order to the other). I don't have data on prior years though.

Oh, but did you know that b/c of the number-theoretics of 2026, the year allows us to give a dynamical reformulation of the P vs NP problem (A Millennium Prize Problem, worth $1M), thereby showing both that it is the wrong question to ask and that P is different from NP. (10 pages, written with AGI)