Thank you for specifying "audit" rather than hand count. It's hard to explain, yet easy to demonstrate; a well designed sample turns out to be more accurate than a full count.

They want to seize the equipment to eliminate evidence of tampering with code in the machines (you know, like ETA's excellent analysis suggests may have happened).

Remember, every accusation by this administration turns out to be an admission, and I expect this is no different.

Share our posts and reports with the people in your life. And consider purchasing some merch or donating so we can continue analyzing more elections and pursuing court actions to verify the vote!

Learn more at ElectionTruthAlliance.org
Watch the full interview here: youtu.be/itiSYnhSnHk

Hand counts of all results is not necessary or cost effective. Statistically significant sample *audits* however, should definitely be performed and prescribed by law.

Sadly, people don't understand how that works and will resist it - especially if have a vested interest in the cheating side....

Here's the arresting chump.

Someone knows who he is.

I would say, "Shit. Well *that* didn't work out. Time for another flood or something..."

Like how many bugs you eat every year without knowing?