They tried the first time. It was why the first term was so chaotic. No one with any skill isn't going to touch the second term.
December 22, 2025 at 4:38 AM
They tried the first time. It was why the first term was so chaotic. No one with any skill isn't going to touch the second term.
Reposted by Jingle Ggobs
"cite your sources" is not just an externally-imposed mandate but a personal discipline on thought itself. "cite your sources" is how you keep yourself in contact with reality. "cite your sources" is how you keep yourself from shadowboxing your own imagination."
December 21, 2025 at 6:59 PM
"cite your sources" is not just an externally-imposed mandate but a personal discipline on thought itself. "cite your sources" is how you keep yourself in contact with reality. "cite your sources" is how you keep yourself from shadowboxing your own imagination."
Thanks. I was mixing "employment numbers" and "unemployment numbers".
December 19, 2025 at 10:41 PM
Thanks. I was mixing "employment numbers" and "unemployment numbers".
Reposted by Jingle Ggobs
Imagine how boring it would be to live in a city with normal sports teams
December 16, 2025 at 2:28 AM
Imagine how boring it would be to live in a city with normal sports teams
It's a single step. Delegitimize the administration, establish a counterinsurgency.
December 18, 2025 at 6:23 AM
It's a single step. Delegitimize the administration, establish a counterinsurgency.
What I don't know is if we currently ask "how hard are you looking?" (how many postings did you apply to or asking employers how many people applied and how many of those were serious canidates and would we with a universal benefits.
December 18, 2025 at 5:37 AM
What I don't know is if we currently ask "how hard are you looking?" (how many postings did you apply to or asking employers how many people applied and how many of those were serious canidates and would we with a universal benefits.
Current unemployment % is just looking at payroll numbers and surveying peeps and asking "are you employed, are you looking for work?"
December 18, 2025 at 5:34 AM
Current unemployment % is just looking at payroll numbers and surveying peeps and asking "are you employed, are you looking for work?"
Depends on what you mean by "full employment". Plenty of people have jobs just for the health insurance. With UHC those people wouldn't be working, would they be included in the unemployment numbers? A UBI might decrease the numbers working (or actually increase its kind of muddled), would they?
December 18, 2025 at 5:34 AM
Depends on what you mean by "full employment". Plenty of people have jobs just for the health insurance. With UHC those people wouldn't be working, would they be included in the unemployment numbers? A UBI might decrease the numbers working (or actually increase its kind of muddled), would they?
Reposted by Jingle Ggobs
100%. For example, what if voters aren’t asking for a line graph showing retail theft going down, but to not see any context-free, undated mass shoplifting videos in their feeds? Good luck with that if our palantíri algo overlords don’t wish it.
December 18, 2025 at 3:37 AM
100%. For example, what if voters aren’t asking for a line graph showing retail theft going down, but to not see any context-free, undated mass shoplifting videos in their feeds? Good luck with that if our palantíri algo overlords don’t wish it.