Gitansh Garg
@gitanshgarg.bsky.social
Neurosymbolic AI lover
Working on lagrange(something like devin but it is actually working)
Working on lagrange(something like devin but it is actually working)
Not too far when we'll have physicists, biologists, scientists also good at interpretebility will discover new laws, inventions,etc. by studying neurosym models that are interpretable that learned patterns of doing something scientific.
December 31, 2024 at 4:30 PM
Not too far when we'll have physicists, biologists, scientists also good at interpretebility will discover new laws, inventions,etc. by studying neurosym models that are interpretable that learned patterns of doing something scientific.
Reposted by Gitansh Garg
not enough is being said about DeepSeek’s multi token prediction (MTP)
They were able to get sonnet-level performance with less data than llama 3.3 70B
Does that mean scaling isn’t over? (if we can just be more efficient) Also, does that mean we can train a LLM fully on properly licensed content?
They were able to get sonnet-level performance with less data than llama 3.3 70B
Does that mean scaling isn’t over? (if we can just be more efficient) Also, does that mean we can train a LLM fully on properly licensed content?
December 26, 2024 at 11:54 PM
not enough is being said about DeepSeek’s multi token prediction (MTP)
They were able to get sonnet-level performance with less data than llama 3.3 70B
Does that mean scaling isn’t over? (if we can just be more efficient) Also, does that mean we can train a LLM fully on properly licensed content?
They were able to get sonnet-level performance with less data than llama 3.3 70B
Does that mean scaling isn’t over? (if we can just be more efficient) Also, does that mean we can train a LLM fully on properly licensed content?
I think a lot of future equations to do work- in physics , chemistry,aerodynamics etc. works is going to be in the form of model weights(basically a SUPERHUGE equation)
December 4, 2024 at 7:20 PM
I think a lot of future equations to do work- in physics , chemistry,aerodynamics etc. works is going to be in the form of model weights(basically a SUPERHUGE equation)
Reposted by Gitansh Garg
Are you a grad student in AI interested in neuroscience and neuroAI?
Become a summer neuroAI intern at CSHL!
www.schooljobs.com/careers/cshl...
Become a summer neuroAI intern at CSHL!
www.schooljobs.com/careers/cshl...
December 3, 2024 at 2:14 PM
Are you a grad student in AI interested in neuroscience and neuroAI?
Become a summer neuroAI intern at CSHL!
www.schooljobs.com/careers/cshl...
Become a summer neuroAI intern at CSHL!
www.schooljobs.com/careers/cshl...
Do you guys want Lagrange?
Lagrange is an AI software engineer - like Devin, but it works amazingly.
We're giving it for alpha testing. If you code, make projects, etc., dm me or tell me to dm you.
Some projects made by Lagrange without us writing a single line of code:
Lagrange is an AI software engineer - like Devin, but it works amazingly.
We're giving it for alpha testing. If you code, make projects, etc., dm me or tell me to dm you.
Some projects made by Lagrange without us writing a single line of code:
November 30, 2024 at 9:46 AM
Do you guys want Lagrange?
Lagrange is an AI software engineer - like Devin, but it works amazingly.
We're giving it for alpha testing. If you code, make projects, etc., dm me or tell me to dm you.
Some projects made by Lagrange without us writing a single line of code:
Lagrange is an AI software engineer - like Devin, but it works amazingly.
We're giving it for alpha testing. If you code, make projects, etc., dm me or tell me to dm you.
Some projects made by Lagrange without us writing a single line of code:
I think in set designing and visuals, Stanley Kubrick was much ahead of Christopher nolan. Nuclear explosions in Dr. Strangelove felt a bit more impactful to me than Oppenheimer's.
And the visuals of 2001: space odyssey in 1968 are inexplicably incredible.
And the visuals of 2001: space odyssey in 1968 are inexplicably incredible.
November 30, 2024 at 12:15 AM
I think in set designing and visuals, Stanley Kubrick was much ahead of Christopher nolan. Nuclear explosions in Dr. Strangelove felt a bit more impactful to me than Oppenheimer's.
And the visuals of 2001: space odyssey in 1968 are inexplicably incredible.
And the visuals of 2001: space odyssey in 1968 are inexplicably incredible.
At the Start of my college, I got an idea of open world games where depending on each action you take, the environment for next steps are created on the go as you play by AI for you. So, the game is exclusively made for you and you only.
November 27, 2024 at 5:25 PM
At the Start of my college, I got an idea of open world games where depending on each action you take, the environment for next steps are created on the go as you play by AI for you. So, the game is exclusively made for you and you only.
idk why there are not people HEAVILY working on something like neurosymbolic AI.
If we really want to make AI "understand" things, giving it an internal framework to think about things should be the most obvious step from the very start. (1/n)
If we really want to make AI "understand" things, giving it an internal framework to think about things should be the most obvious step from the very start. (1/n)
November 23, 2024 at 9:37 AM
idk why there are not people HEAVILY working on something like neurosymbolic AI.
If we really want to make AI "understand" things, giving it an internal framework to think about things should be the most obvious step from the very start. (1/n)
If we really want to make AI "understand" things, giving it an internal framework to think about things should be the most obvious step from the very start. (1/n)