gnpd.bsky.social
@gnpd.bsky.social
Probably more but I was thinking of a very vocal one (who shall remain nameless lest I incur his wrath)
February 4, 2026 at 9:40 PM
Any individual who describes creativity as “finding and breaking down patterns” doesn’t have a creative bone in their body.
He seems like the type of guy to complain about noise in space while watching Star Wars
February 3, 2026 at 1:49 AM
If he is, that would legitimately crush me.
His time in the limelight was earlier in the century though so I kinda doubt it
February 2, 2026 at 10:08 PM
I can think of a certain climate-sphere individual who isn't gonna like this post...
February 2, 2026 at 9:07 PM
Each day it feels like we further enter a much darker version of the Adam West Batman universe
February 2, 2026 at 3:18 PM
The same man who bragged about how he survived an assassination attempt at a memorial service for Charlie Kirk. Can we fire him too?
December 15, 2025 at 6:51 PM
Happy to see my local newspaper embrace science and your work. Happens all too rarely down here
December 14, 2025 at 6:57 PM
The world needs a Michael Mann biopic directed by Michael Mann.
October 15, 2025 at 12:59 AM
GFS forecast has spiked up today. Wonder what’s going on there
October 4, 2025 at 5:40 PM
”I trust science“ crowd when a scientist says something that doesn’t align with their beliefs
September 28, 2025 at 11:11 PM
I wonder if anyone in Trump’s circle thought the rapture was gonna happen today. I’m leaning towards yes
September 23, 2025 at 7:14 PM
Now there‘s evidence
September 22, 2025 at 5:25 PM
I have a theory that climate articles are always given ridiculous headlines by the NYT editor on purpose, don‘t have any evidence but still….
September 21, 2025 at 10:24 PM
Do you have a hypothesis as to why the sudden uptick is happening?
September 16, 2025 at 3:15 AM
What was going on in the 1940's that caused such a spike? Some strong el nino's or something like that?
September 10, 2025 at 5:15 PM
*nuanced article dealing with the complexities of climate modeling, both in the short and long term and potential shortcomings*
NYT editor: wE CanT exPlAiN whAT wErE sEeinG
August 26, 2025 at 9:43 PM
Frank Zappa was saying this 40 years ago and it’s still relevant today. Imagine what he’d say about today’s media
August 23, 2025 at 4:18 AM
B-b-but the shipping aerosols…..Hunga Tonga…….. you mean to tell me that the climate scientists were….. right about long term models???????
a cartoon smiley face with tears coming out of it 's eyes and mouth .
ALT: a cartoon smiley face with tears coming out of it 's eyes and mouth .
media.tenor.com
August 4, 2025 at 10:11 PM
Thank you for the clarification👍. Later on in that same article they make reference to no warming after net zero but it’s still anxiety inducing
July 21, 2025 at 12:14 AM
Is the section about 0.5C accurate? I thought warming stops once we reach net zero
July 20, 2025 at 11:08 PM
Certainly one of the first prominent ones. I’d say nowadays there are some pretty effective communicators too like Dr. Schmidt and Hausfather
July 12, 2025 at 5:17 PM
With scientific credentials to back it up
July 12, 2025 at 4:58 PM
As an aside I thought you meant the actor Brian Cox at first😂. Him and Dr. Mann both suffer from a Hollywood identity thief
July 12, 2025 at 4:35 PM
Definitely. Sagan, Tyson and Cox all have pretty illustrious scientific backgrounds.
July 12, 2025 at 4:34 PM
I suppose so. Nowadays non-climate scientists can make waves and attract large followings (Leon Simons, Ben See, Eliot Jacobson, etc.)
July 12, 2025 at 3:09 AM