Aslan
banner
goodwithcolour.bsky.social
Aslan
@goodwithcolour.bsky.social
Recommend my account to ten friends and win a holiday

Mostly films, comics, chronic pain, cats

MCR (the place)
Clegg is personally responsible though. He could have said no to the plan, and it wouldn’t have happened.
January 20, 2026 at 6:03 PM
Tbh I think it’s more he’s 60 years old now and hasn’t been a professional boxer for 3 decades
December 20, 2025 at 9:57 AM
No it doesn’t, he would say this about a child.
December 20, 2025 at 9:50 AM
Why on earth would you share what he has to say about anything in the world
December 20, 2025 at 9:48 AM
Because the noun is ”women”, you don’t say “blackwomen”, or “tallwomen”. The aim is to delegitimise trans woman as an identity.
December 3, 2025 at 5:19 PM
yes.
December 3, 2025 at 5:15 PM
In neither of these documents does the term “transwoman” or “transwomen” feature
December 3, 2025 at 5:11 PM
Where do they do that, Neal? If I try to search for it I don’t find any examples of stonewall ever using the term, pages and pages of quotes from transphobes using the term while they rant about Stonewall though.
December 3, 2025 at 5:03 PM
Fyi “transwomen” is a slur designed by transphobes, it is not a category of person, the noun is “women”
December 3, 2025 at 4:51 PM
The SC has very much already bowed to billionaires, you must have been asleep that month.
December 3, 2025 at 4:28 PM
December 3, 2025 at 4:24 PM
That’s the thing about lawfare, Neal, it doesn’t matter what the law is when on one side you have a billionaire with essentially limitless resources to sue you into oblivion, people will just acquiesce because they can’t afford to fight it.
December 3, 2025 at 4:22 PM
They’ve been screaming what they want from the rooftops for over ten years (complete trans exclusion from public life), you are just not listening.
December 3, 2025 at 4:06 PM
Just so long as they're calling the trans women “men” at every stage, and vice versa, not at all exclusionary!
December 3, 2025 at 3:56 PM
Genuinely can not tell if these people are just woefully misinformed about What the transphobes have been up to for the last decade, or if they’re being deliberately disingenuous
December 3, 2025 at 3:42 PM
Sure thing.
December 3, 2025 at 3:11 PM
You’re not talking about fair competition though. You’re talking about excluding all trans people from even amateur sport, and that is 100% a bigoted opinion, you just think you’re a good person and couldn’t possibly ever have one of those.
December 3, 2025 at 2:50 PM
Only one person here not paying attention to what amateur sports orgs are saying on the subject, chief.
December 3, 2025 at 2:14 PM
That pretty much all we hear from amateur sports clubs on the subject is how much they hate being forced to exclude their friends and how it does nothing to protect anyone doesn’t matter, the transphobes have decided they are the sole arbiters of what trans people are allowed to do and that’s it now
December 3, 2025 at 2:10 PM
Neal won’t respond to this because he knows it’s purely transphobia.
December 3, 2025 at 2:03 PM
QQ Neal, since we’re engaging in “good faith”, how may trans women won sporting competitions in the 20 years they were allowed to compete?
December 3, 2025 at 11:50 AM
Yes, transphobes famously love engaging in good faith, which is why they’re now bullying the WI and girl guides with lawfare
December 3, 2025 at 11:49 AM
Hi Neal, I’m happy to say I don’t believe you give a shit about womens sport except as a cudgel to beat trans women with, but regardless the equality act does not dictate to any intentional sport bodies what regressive rules they apply.
December 3, 2025 at 11:43 AM
They could amend the equality act to make sex include trans people.
December 3, 2025 at 11:29 AM