Gordon Eldest
@gordon-eldest.bsky.social
Nuclear physicist
Hobby astrophysics
Hobby astrophysics
Bias is a real issue
AI isn’t able to criticize
The internal reward mechanism of LLM is built to satisfy the auditor
However it may help scrutinizing long paper but shouldn’t at all be a decision system
AI isn’t able to criticize
The internal reward mechanism of LLM is built to satisfy the auditor
However it may help scrutinizing long paper but shouldn’t at all be a decision system
December 28, 2025 at 5:47 PM
Bias is a real issue
AI isn’t able to criticize
The internal reward mechanism of LLM is built to satisfy the auditor
However it may help scrutinizing long paper but shouldn’t at all be a decision system
AI isn’t able to criticize
The internal reward mechanism of LLM is built to satisfy the auditor
However it may help scrutinizing long paper but shouldn’t at all be a decision system
Good question
So obviously true that the issue never hit my minds.
So obviously true that the issue never hit my minds.
December 28, 2025 at 4:29 PM
Good question
So obviously true that the issue never hit my minds.
So obviously true that the issue never hit my minds.
As human ingenuity is paramount
By the time such colonial trap would settle, rare earth wouldn’t be usefull, this will then turn to a burden on gov budget.
Rare earth aren’t without workaround.
By the time such colonial trap would settle, rare earth wouldn’t be usefull, this will then turn to a burden on gov budget.
Rare earth aren’t without workaround.
December 27, 2025 at 2:16 PM
As human ingenuity is paramount
By the time such colonial trap would settle, rare earth wouldn’t be usefull, this will then turn to a burden on gov budget.
Rare earth aren’t without workaround.
By the time such colonial trap would settle, rare earth wouldn’t be usefull, this will then turn to a burden on gov budget.
Rare earth aren’t without workaround.
Some daily prescriptions are life‑critical — missing even a few doses can have serious consequences.
Pharmacies and supply chains aren’t always reliable, so building a small, safe backup isn’t wasteful — it’s responsible. It’s not a loss; it’s deferred use.
Pharmacies and supply chains aren’t always reliable, so building a small, safe backup isn’t wasteful — it’s responsible. It’s not a loss; it’s deferred use.
December 27, 2025 at 2:43 AM
Some daily prescriptions are life‑critical — missing even a few doses can have serious consequences.
Pharmacies and supply chains aren’t always reliable, so building a small, safe backup isn’t wasteful — it’s responsible. It’s not a loss; it’s deferred use.
Pharmacies and supply chains aren’t always reliable, so building a small, safe backup isn’t wasteful — it’s responsible. It’s not a loss; it’s deferred use.
You obviously spread disinformation
NATO not only doesn’t have a tradition of lies
But cannot there are too many free informant and journalist and social media on site
Exactly the opposite of Russia
You cherry pick or create fake info.
The existence of your post show how desperate is Russia
NATO not only doesn’t have a tradition of lies
But cannot there are too many free informant and journalist and social media on site
Exactly the opposite of Russia
You cherry pick or create fake info.
The existence of your post show how desperate is Russia
December 26, 2025 at 6:56 PM
You obviously spread disinformation
NATO not only doesn’t have a tradition of lies
But cannot there are too many free informant and journalist and social media on site
Exactly the opposite of Russia
You cherry pick or create fake info.
The existence of your post show how desperate is Russia
NATO not only doesn’t have a tradition of lies
But cannot there are too many free informant and journalist and social media on site
Exactly the opposite of Russia
You cherry pick or create fake info.
The existence of your post show how desperate is Russia
Funny I read it the other way around:
“Understand Why Russia Can Never Defeat Ukraine”
Because Russia is loosing the war they started, has already lost it as they won’t recover from their losses before decades and anyway will be defeated.
“Understand Why Russia Can Never Defeat Ukraine”
Because Russia is loosing the war they started, has already lost it as they won’t recover from their losses before decades and anyway will be defeated.
December 26, 2025 at 7:31 AM
Funny I read it the other way around:
“Understand Why Russia Can Never Defeat Ukraine”
Because Russia is loosing the war they started, has already lost it as they won’t recover from their losses before decades and anyway will be defeated.
“Understand Why Russia Can Never Defeat Ukraine”
Because Russia is loosing the war they started, has already lost it as they won’t recover from their losses before decades and anyway will be defeated.
What about Louisiana or Quebec or Alaska ?
Although Russia does claim Alaska with the same argument
Although Russia does claim Alaska with the same argument
December 26, 2025 at 7:24 AM
What about Louisiana or Quebec or Alaska ?
Although Russia does claim Alaska with the same argument
Although Russia does claim Alaska with the same argument
And?
Success is a marketing issue in AI theses days
What contribution could he bring?
Success is a marketing issue in AI theses days
What contribution could he bring?
December 25, 2025 at 11:40 PM
And?
Success is a marketing issue in AI theses days
What contribution could he bring?
Success is a marketing issue in AI theses days
What contribution could he bring?
My mistake
Yes fusion is very promising and safe but still far away
Fission is already a good solution and frankly Chernobyl is due to human laziness and lack of concern for safety
Fukushima too , putting generator under sea level is a major mistake.
Hydro killed more than nuclear
Yes fusion is very promising and safe but still far away
Fission is already a good solution and frankly Chernobyl is due to human laziness and lack of concern for safety
Fukushima too , putting generator under sea level is a major mistake.
Hydro killed more than nuclear
December 25, 2025 at 9:31 PM
My mistake
Yes fusion is very promising and safe but still far away
Fission is already a good solution and frankly Chernobyl is due to human laziness and lack of concern for safety
Fukushima too , putting generator under sea level is a major mistake.
Hydro killed more than nuclear
Yes fusion is very promising and safe but still far away
Fission is already a good solution and frankly Chernobyl is due to human laziness and lack of concern for safety
Fukushima too , putting generator under sea level is a major mistake.
Hydro killed more than nuclear
Their offers is incredibly non competitive
Prime video even with ads or free lulu does it better.
I don’t understand what is happening to Netflix, looks like they want to milk the cow.
But the cow punch out, I cancel the auto renewal.
Prime video even with ads or free lulu does it better.
I don’t understand what is happening to Netflix, looks like they want to milk the cow.
But the cow punch out, I cancel the auto renewal.
December 25, 2025 at 12:29 PM
Their offers is incredibly non competitive
Prime video even with ads or free lulu does it better.
I don’t understand what is happening to Netflix, looks like they want to milk the cow.
But the cow punch out, I cancel the auto renewal.
Prime video even with ads or free lulu does it better.
I don’t understand what is happening to Netflix, looks like they want to milk the cow.
But the cow punch out, I cancel the auto renewal.
Argument are dubious but wind turbines aren’t a good solution
Doesn’t solve nonpilotable energy
Also a major issue is the grid.
Carbon free solution order of respect to the planet:
Hydroelectric
Undersea stream turbine
Nuclear fission(in 20 years)
Nuclear fusion
Solar (more predictable)
Doesn’t solve nonpilotable energy
Also a major issue is the grid.
Carbon free solution order of respect to the planet:
Hydroelectric
Undersea stream turbine
Nuclear fission(in 20 years)
Nuclear fusion
Solar (more predictable)
December 23, 2025 at 5:29 PM
Argument are dubious but wind turbines aren’t a good solution
Doesn’t solve nonpilotable energy
Also a major issue is the grid.
Carbon free solution order of respect to the planet:
Hydroelectric
Undersea stream turbine
Nuclear fission(in 20 years)
Nuclear fusion
Solar (more predictable)
Doesn’t solve nonpilotable energy
Also a major issue is the grid.
Carbon free solution order of respect to the planet:
Hydroelectric
Undersea stream turbine
Nuclear fission(in 20 years)
Nuclear fusion
Solar (more predictable)
Batteries aren’t a solution for this cases
Very marginal and doesn’t solve nonpilotable energy
Also a major issue the grid is not ta
Carbon free solution are :in order of respect to the planet
Hydroelectric
Undersea stream turbine
Nuclear fission(in 20 years)
Nuclear fusion
Solar (predictable)
Very marginal and doesn’t solve nonpilotable energy
Also a major issue the grid is not ta
Carbon free solution are :in order of respect to the planet
Hydroelectric
Undersea stream turbine
Nuclear fission(in 20 years)
Nuclear fusion
Solar (predictable)
December 23, 2025 at 5:26 PM
Batteries aren’t a solution for this cases
Very marginal and doesn’t solve nonpilotable energy
Also a major issue the grid is not ta
Carbon free solution are :in order of respect to the planet
Hydroelectric
Undersea stream turbine
Nuclear fission(in 20 years)
Nuclear fusion
Solar (predictable)
Very marginal and doesn’t solve nonpilotable energy
Also a major issue the grid is not ta
Carbon free solution are :in order of respect to the planet
Hydroelectric
Undersea stream turbine
Nuclear fission(in 20 years)
Nuclear fusion
Solar (predictable)
Remember that by essence and by construction all transactions are public from the beginning and forever.
This is mandatory to ensure security of blockchain.
It’s frequently a missed point.
This is mandatory to ensure security of blockchain.
It’s frequently a missed point.
December 20, 2025 at 10:25 PM
Remember that by essence and by construction all transactions are public from the beginning and forever.
This is mandatory to ensure security of blockchain.
It’s frequently a missed point.
This is mandatory to ensure security of blockchain.
It’s frequently a missed point.
I only trust paper for that,
You can put all offline info on paper
It’s not a lot.
A good OCR is safer than a piece of hardware.
As per the offline concept: it’s inherently safe on good quality blockchain
L1 or L2 but on top popular BC
Most of the risk is in odd brand of token.
You can put all offline info on paper
It’s not a lot.
A good OCR is safer than a piece of hardware.
As per the offline concept: it’s inherently safe on good quality blockchain
L1 or L2 but on top popular BC
Most of the risk is in odd brand of token.
December 20, 2025 at 10:22 PM
I only trust paper for that,
You can put all offline info on paper
It’s not a lot.
A good OCR is safer than a piece of hardware.
As per the offline concept: it’s inherently safe on good quality blockchain
L1 or L2 but on top popular BC
Most of the risk is in odd brand of token.
You can put all offline info on paper
It’s not a lot.
A good OCR is safer than a piece of hardware.
As per the offline concept: it’s inherently safe on good quality blockchain
L1 or L2 but on top popular BC
Most of the risk is in odd brand of token.
The look and feel of Rev 26 is make me sick
Blurry button sea sick transition
A major mistake
Blurry button sea sick transition
A major mistake
December 14, 2025 at 3:12 AM
The look and feel of Rev 26 is make me sick
Blurry button sea sick transition
A major mistake
Blurry button sea sick transition
A major mistake
They aren’t doing better decision in general, and they lock evolution
Many people use Waze or google map but take it as a news feed about roadblock and challenge the itinerary.
Not only ack of context for AI to ensure the best result Luck and curiosity are part of a mandatory part of evolution.
Many people use Waze or google map but take it as a news feed about roadblock and challenge the itinerary.
Not only ack of context for AI to ensure the best result Luck and curiosity are part of a mandatory part of evolution.
December 13, 2025 at 10:51 AM
They aren’t doing better decision in general, and they lock evolution
Many people use Waze or google map but take it as a news feed about roadblock and challenge the itinerary.
Not only ack of context for AI to ensure the best result Luck and curiosity are part of a mandatory part of evolution.
Many people use Waze or google map but take it as a news feed about roadblock and challenge the itinerary.
Not only ack of context for AI to ensure the best result Luck and curiosity are part of a mandatory part of evolution.
Fried pan into the fire ?
He won’t fire Noem for somebody more lenient ! Don’t be fooled.
And she isn’t very smart so that give you an idea of what is the reference here. It’s just the beginning
He won’t fire Noem for somebody more lenient ! Don’t be fooled.
And she isn’t very smart so that give you an idea of what is the reference here. It’s just the beginning
December 9, 2025 at 11:00 AM
Fried pan into the fire ?
He won’t fire Noem for somebody more lenient ! Don’t be fooled.
And she isn’t very smart so that give you an idea of what is the reference here. It’s just the beginning
He won’t fire Noem for somebody more lenient ! Don’t be fooled.
And she isn’t very smart so that give you an idea of what is the reference here. It’s just the beginning
Apple made a strategic error at a time Microsoft is making a major mistake with window 11 which is a very dangerous os
December 9, 2025 at 9:59 AM
Apple made a strategic error at a time Microsoft is making a major mistake with window 11 which is a very dangerous os
Strange
Trump decided that the future of Europe is not with USA and Europe agree
Something fishy here
Trump decided that the future of Europe is not with USA and Europe agree
Something fishy here
December 9, 2025 at 9:56 AM
Strange
Trump decided that the future of Europe is not with USA and Europe agree
Something fishy here
Trump decided that the future of Europe is not with USA and Europe agree
Something fishy here
The weakness of wallets is in the strength of their security
Everybody concerns is to loose the key phrase (private key) and this a death sentence for the wallet content.
Hence bad habit to copy it in too many weak places.
Deep biometric is a better way if used associated with a trust third party
Everybody concerns is to loose the key phrase (private key) and this a death sentence for the wallet content.
Hence bad habit to copy it in too many weak places.
Deep biometric is a better way if used associated with a trust third party
December 7, 2025 at 1:47 AM
The weakness of wallets is in the strength of their security
Everybody concerns is to loose the key phrase (private key) and this a death sentence for the wallet content.
Hence bad habit to copy it in too many weak places.
Deep biometric is a better way if used associated with a trust third party
Everybody concerns is to loose the key phrase (private key) and this a death sentence for the wallet content.
Hence bad habit to copy it in too many weak places.
Deep biometric is a better way if used associated with a trust third party