Giuseppe Carleo
@gppcarleo.bsky.social
790 followers 320 following 65 posts
Computational Quantum Physicist - EPFL Lausanne, Switzerland
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
gppcarleo.bsky.social
I have a new opening for several funded PHD positions in my group (the Computational Quantum Science Lab, at EPFL). If you are a talented, motivated student, please apply here www.epfl.ch/labs/cqsl/jo.... I am especially looking to hire in scientific ML applications/NQS; not in quantum computing.
Job Opportunities at CQSL
At the Computational Quantum Science Lab we typically have several openings yearly (at the PhD/ Postdoc level). Applications are reviewed twice a year, at the beginning of April and at the beginning o...
www.epfl.ch
gppcarleo.bsky.social
Or you can go here neos-server.org/neos/solvers... and wait about 0.02 seconds for the problem to be solved exactly 😂
gppcarleo.bsky.social
I am looking for a talented postdoc to join my group at EPFL, in Lausanne, Switzerland. Goal is to develop and apply state-of-the-art neural quantum states for electronic structure and related applications. Position to be filled soon, excellent conditions! Apply here: www.epfl.ch/labs/cqsl/jo...
Job Opportunities at CQSL
At the Computational Quantum Science Lab we typically have several openings yearly (at the PhD/ Postdoc level). Applications are reviewed twice a year, at the beginning of April and at the beginning o...
www.epfl.ch
Reposted by Giuseppe Carleo
joachimfavre.bsky.social
I recently published the LaTeX notes I took in three amazing classes this semester:
- Computational quantum physics (Prof. @gppcarleo.bsky.social)
- Quantum information theory (Prof. @qzoeholmes.bsky.social)
- Sublinear algorithms for big data analysis (Prof. Michael Kapralov)
Link below👇
Two-panel drake meme, titled "Morris' algorithm be like".
Top panel: Drake looks away, disapprovingly, next to the legend "Counting to n in O(log n) space".
Bottom panel: Drake points approvingly at the legend "Counting to n in O(loglog n) space.
gppcarleo.bsky.social
New work with Douglas Hendry and Alessandro Sinibaldi: Grassmann Variational Monte Calro with neural wave functions arxiv.org/abs/2507.10287
This is a formalization and an extension (e.g. natural gradient descent-wise) of the nice excited-state framework for VMC developed by @davidpfau.com et al.
Grassmann Variational Monte Carlo with neural wave functions
Excited states play a central role in determining the physical properties of quantum matter, yet their accurate computation in many-body systems remains a formidable challenge for numerical methods. W...
arxiv.org
gppcarleo.bsky.social
The training framework is certainly important (for example one needs to use the "correct version" of SR in this case, but also the neural networks should be good enough to generalize. For Ising it definitely works with transformers ! arxiv.org/abs/2502.09488
Foundation Neural-Network Quantum States
Foundation models are highly versatile neural-network architectures capable of processing different data types, such as text and images, and generalizing across various tasks like classification and g...
arxiv.org
gppcarleo.bsky.social
A foundation NQS allows to reduce (by several orders of magnitude!!) the cost needed in QMC/Diffusion Monte Carlo calculations to span the same phase diagram (while achieving higher accuracy than DMC). We also include, at T=0, the full quantum wave functions for protons, beyond Born-Opp. (2/2)
Universal neural wave functions for high-pressure hydrogen
We leverage the power of neural quantum states to describe the ground state wave function of solid and liquid dense hydrogen, including both electronic and protonic degrees of freedom. For static prot...
arxiv.org
gppcarleo.bsky.social
Ab-initio preprint: we study high-pressure hydrogen over a relatively large range of pressures and temperatures (in the Born-Opp. approx.). Crucially, we do it with a **single** wave function for all values of proton configurations. Effort led by my PHD David Linteau, arxiv.org/abs/2504.07062 (1/2)
Universal neural wave functions for high-pressure hydrogen
We leverage the power of neural quantum states to describe the ground state wave function of solid and liquid dense hydrogen, including both electronic and protonic degrees of freedom. For static prot...
arxiv.org
Reposted by Giuseppe Carleo
franknoe.bsky.social
Simulating full quantum mechanical ground- and excited state surfaces with deep quantum Monte Carlo by Zeno Schätzle, Bernat Szabo and Alice Cuzzocrea.

arxiv.org/abs/2503.19847

🧵⬇️
gppcarleo.bsky.social
Our approach surpasses all second-quantized NQS results for molecules published so far, despite being a much simpler ansatz conceptually. This suggests that for small to intermediate molecules, fully correlated wave functions might not be necessary. 4/5​
gppcarleo.bsky.social
Using optimized contractions, our method scales computational cost with the fourth power of the number of basis functions. Benchmarking against exact full-configuration interaction results, we achieved lower variational energies than CCSD(T) for several molecules in the double-zeta basis. 3/5​
gppcarleo.bsky.social
While this ansatz is as old as quantum chemistry, fully optimizing it has been challenging. Our innovation lies in efficiently optimizing the determinants by leveraging the quadratic dependence of energy on selected parameters, allowing for exact optimization. 2/5​
gppcarleo.bsky.social
​Excited to share our latest quantum chemistry preprint led by Clemens Giuliani. We employ a "simple" variational wavefunction composed of a few hundred optimized non-orthogonal Slater determinants, achieving energy accuracies comparable to state-of-the-art methods. arxiv.org/abs/2503.14502 1/5​
Energy differences with respect to CCSD(T) in the cc-pVDZ basis set. The shaded area indicates results within chemical accuracy (1 kcal/mol) from FCI/DMRG, and the hatched area from CCSD(T). The molecules are ordered w.r.t increasing number of electrons, grouping those with equal numbers together. For those marked with * we employed a particle-hole transformation.
gppcarleo.bsky.social
In the absence of a community consensus on what it really means to obtain quantum advantage over **all possible** classical methods, why keep stirring controversy instead of stating that advantage is over some X or Y classical numerical methods "only"?(2/2)
gppcarleo.bsky.social
If it wasn't clear enough already that I have nothing against the results of Dwave, and others, read this: www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-... The problem is not the results, it's the way they are presented, and how they are perceived more broadly. (1/2)
How Scientists, Publishers and Investors Create Quantum Hype
D-Wave’s fresh claim that it has achieved “quantum advantage” has sparked criticism of the company—and of the scientific process itself
www.scientificamerican.com
gppcarleo.bsky.social
I am insinuating nothing. the preprint is pretty clear we analyze the diamond geometry. we will provide more geometries soon, but the burden of proof that you can beat "all classical methods" is on your side, since you decided to make this questionable (cynical?!) claim in the first place.
gppcarleo.bsky.social
we compared against ground truth computed with MPS at the largest scale you provided, and also against your own experiment at the scale where mps was not available... I'm not sure what your remark is about
gppcarleo.bsky.social
If they are easy as you suggest, why you claimed they would take ~200 years on one of the largest supercomputers available ? I'm confused.