GreenEyedImp
LightNews LightNews
banner
greeneyedimp.bsky.social
GreenEyedImp
@greeneyedimp.bsky.social
88 followers 210 following 120 posts
Artistic ND aging hippie, maya.505 on Signal. Expressive and forest therapies, sun and wind and water and earth, whole foods are the best medicine there is. Activism starts with community level micro actions. Harford County MD
Posts Replies Media Videos
greeneyedimp.bsky.social
I get the no edit function really but lol…”Trixie says have some stress relief”
February 16, 2025 at 3:23 PM
greeneyedimp.bsky.social
a picture of a unicorn with the words internal screaming above it
ALT: a picture of a unicorn with the words internal screaming above it
media.tenor.com
February 15, 2025 at 1:05 AM
greeneyedimp.bsky.social
lol they finally fucking got the second one. Undetected for 17 hours, priceless
February 14, 2025 at 8:28 PM
greeneyedimp.bsky.social
3/last two - alt text for entire response finishes on 3rd out of 6 screen shots, previous ⬆️
February 14, 2025 at 7:46 PM
greeneyedimp.bsky.social
2/
Comparing Project 2025, a policy proposal by conservative think tanks aiming to reshape the U.S. government under a future Republican administration, with Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler’s political manifesto, requires careful examination of their ideological goals, methods, and implications. While they emerge from different historical and political contexts, both documents outline a vision for government and society, making it possible to compare and contrast their themes. Similarities 1. Centralization of Power & Government Overhaul • Mein Kampf argues for a strong, authoritarian government that consolidates power under a single ideology, with an emphasis on national unity and purity. • Project 2025 proposes restructuring the U.S. government by expanding executive power, replacing civil servants with ideologically aligned officials, and rolling back administrative agencies’ independence. 2. Rejection of Political Opponents & Democratic Pluralism • Hitler describes political adversaries (socialists, communists, liberals, and Jews) as existential threats that must be purged. • Project 2025 presents progressive policies, DEI initiatives, and LGBTQ+ rights as harmful to America’s foundations, advocating for their removal from institutions. 3. Nationalism & Cultural Identity • Hitler emphasizes the importance of racial and cultural purity, arguing that Germany’s strength lies in its Aryan identity. • Project 2025 promotes a return to “Judeo-Christian values” and “American exceptionalism,” advocating for policies that reinforce a traditionalist national identity. 4. Control Over Education & Public Discourse • Mein Kampf advocates for state control over education to shape young minds toward Nazi ideology. • Project 2025 pushes for eliminating left-leaning perspectives in education, restricting discussions of race, gender, and progressive social policies in schools and government agencies. 5. Authoritarian Tendencies & Reduction of Civil Liberties • Hitler explicitly rejects democracy in favor of a Führerprinzip (leader principle), where the state is ruled by a strongman. • Project 2025 recommends expanding presidential power, reducing the independence of the judiciary and bureaucracy, and imposing conservative values through executive actions. Differences 1. Race & Ethnic Supremacy • Mein Kampf is explicitly racist, promoting Aryan supremacy and advocating for the removal (and later extermination) of Jews and other groups deemed inferior. • Project 2025 does not advocate racial supremacy but calls for dismantling DEI programs and policies that acknowledge systemic racism, arguing for a colorblind approach that critics say ignores structural inequalities. 2. Use of Violence & Totalitarianism • Mein Kampf endorses the use of violence to achieve political goals, openly calling for the destruction of perceived enemies. • Project 2025 does not advocate for violence but suggests sweeping legal and institutional changes that could suppress opposition and erode democratic safeguards. 3. Economic Policy • Hitler’s vision for the economy was a state-controlled system aimed at military expansion and autarky (self-sufficiency). • Project 2025 favors deregulation, free-market capitalism, and reducing government intervention in business, though it seeks to impose ideological control over corporate policies (e.g., anti-ESG initiatives). 4. Religious Influence • Mein Kampf is not centered on religious ideology, though Hitler manipulates Christian themes for political ends. The Nazi state later suppressed religious institutions that opposed its rule. • Project 2025 is explicitly driven by Christian nationalist ideas, promoting policies that elevate Christian conservative values in government and law. 5. Legal and Institutional Approach • Hitler planned to abolish democratic institutions entirely and create a totalitarian state. • Project 2025 does not seek to abolish democracy outright but restructures government to favor a single ideological vision, potentially leading to authoritarianism through legal means. Conclusion While Mein Kampf is a manifesto for an openly fascist, racially supremacist dictatorship, Project 2025 is a strategic policy document advocating a hard-right transformation of the U.S. government. The biggest distinction is the role of violence—Mein Kampf promotes outright extermination and war, while Project 2025 seeks ideological domination through legal and bureaucratic means. However, both share a disdain for pluralistic democracy, a desire to centralize power, and an agenda that seeks to reshape society based on a rigid ideological framework. Would you like a deeper analysis of specific policies within Project 2025?
February 14, 2025 at 7:45 PM