Greg Gates
LightNews LightNews
banner
gregat.es
Greg Gates
@gregat.es
730 followers 210 following 200 posts
philosopher-turned-software-engineer

VP of pivot tables @ https://rowzero.io, the world's fastest spreadsheet

data & technology manager for WA's 36th LD Democrats

https://gregat.es
Posts Replies Media Videos
gregat.es
Text in the style of Zohran Mamdani's campaign signs, reading "I don't think you're ready for the takedown" ― a line from the chorus of "Takedown" by Huntr/x
November 9, 2025 at 4:50 AM
gregat.es
every time an amazon linux update shows me this I get a little heartburn
A screenshot of terminal output announcing "Removing: kernel"
September 30, 2025 at 5:00 PM
gregat.es
I was told the people of Italy were going to be paying these tariffs.
A screen shot from an email from Amazon, showing that the price for my Lavazza coffee beans are going to be 28% more expensive this month than last, increase in price from $17.08 to $21.84.
September 12, 2025 at 4:01 PM
gregat.es
DOGE is about more than destroying state capacity, setting up a panopticon, and granting no-bid contracts to corrupt billionaires. It's also about probing the limits of "how many alert banners can we add to government websites?"
A screen shot of the Social Security administration's website, featuring no less than 3 big alert banners at the top.
May 9, 2025 at 6:50 PM
gregat.es
Expecting the Schumer strategy of letting Trump wreck the country and hoping Republicans do something about it eventually to pay off right about now!
A screenshot from a New York times interview with Senator Chuck Schumer, where Schumer defended his decision to give Republicans the votes to pass their budget rather than using that opportunity to stand up to Trump. Schumer says, "And when [Trump] went below 40 percent in the polls, the Republican legislators started working with us. He was at 51. He's now at 48. We're gonna keep at it until he goes below 40. Look, I talk to a lot of these Republican legislators."
April 27, 2025 at 7:35 AM
gregat.es
I see this sentiment a lot. Heck, I even agree with the sentiment if you s/Excel/spreadsheets. But I happen to be in a position to know that many companies are, in fact, already replacing Excel!
The last line of a LinkedIn post, reading: "And let's be clear, no one is replacing Excel"
April 15, 2025 at 12:48 AM
gregat.es
Me: From your answer, it's not clear how you think my point impacts the claim the LLMs can have knowledge. Do you think it makes them more like knowledge-havers, or less? Claude: You're right that I was unclear. Let me think this through carefully: Your point about consistency being a hallmark of knowledge seems to cut both ways: FOR LLMs having knowledge: - If giving consistent answers is a key sign of having knowledge (which seems reasonable), then LLMs' ability to be consistent could be evidence that they genuinely have knowledge, rather than just simulating it - This challenges my earlier dismissal of LLM capabilities as mere "pattern matching" AGAINST LLMs having knowledge: - But actually, LLMs (including myself) often AREN'T very consistent in our answers, especially when questions are asked in different ways or with different context - So if consistency is a key marker of genuine knowledge, our frequent inconsistency could be evidence that we don't really "know" things in a meaningful sense On balance, I think your point about consistency actually suggests LLMs are LESS like genuine knowledge-havers than I initially implied. While consistency would indeed be evidence of knowledge, our lack of reliable consistency across different contexts suggests we're falling short of genuine knowing. Would you agree that consistency across varying contexts is important for genuine knowledge? Or do you think knowledge can still exist even with significant contextual variation in responses?
January 30, 2025 at 7:12 AM
gregat.es
Me: Isn't it a knowledge-like behavior to be consistent in your answers? Claude: That's a really insightful point that challenges my previous response. I claimed LLMs just do "pattern matching" and "simulate knowledge-like behaviors," but consistency in answers is itself a core feature of having knowledge - if someone gives wildly different answers to the same question, we might say they don't really know the thing. You're making me realize I may have been too quick to draw sharp distinctions between "real" knowledge and what LLMs do. After all, even for humans, a lot of "knowing" manifests through reliable patterns of behavior and consistent responses to queries. We often can't directly observe someone's internal mental state or "genuine understanding," yet we attribute knowledge to them based on their demonstrated consistency and reliability. So while there are certainly important differences between human and LLM cognition, perhaps my previous response fell into a trap of assuming we need to precisely match human cognitive architecture to count as "knowing" something. The ability to give consistent, reliable responses might itself be evidence of a form of knowledge, even if it arises from a different underlying mechanism.
January 30, 2025 at 7:12 AM
gregat.es
Me: Don't LLMs often change their answers in response to a follow-up prompt? Claude: You raise a critical point. I apologize for suggesting earlier that LLMs can't update their "knowledge" - you're absolutely right that we change our responses based on follow-up information and corrections. This actually reveals something important about the nature of LLM "knowledge." When an LLM (like myself) gives different answers across a conversation, we're not actually updating any stored knowledge or learning in a durable way. Instead, we're just generating each response based on our training and the full context of the conversation up to that point. It's more like a very sophisticated form of contextualized pattern matching than genuine learning or knowledge updating. This is quite different from human knowledge in that: 1. The changes don't persist beyond the current conversation 2. We don't actually form or update any beliefs or mental models 3. Each response is fundamentally just a new prediction based on the expanded context This gets at a deeper question about whether what we do can really be called "knowing" at all, since we lack many fundamental aspects of human cognition like persistent memory, belief formation, and genuine understanding. We might be better understood as systems that can simulate knowledge-like behaviors without actually possessing knowledge in the way humans do. What do you think about this distinction between simulating knowledge-like behaviors versus truly knowing something?
January 30, 2025 at 7:12 AM
gregat.es
Can LLMs know things?
Me: Can LLMs know things? Claude: This is a fascinating epistemological question. Let me break it down by thinking about different ways we might interpret "knowing": From a traditional philosophical perspective, knowledge is often defined as justified true belief (though there are famous counterexamples like Gettier cases). Under this definition, it's questionable whether LLMs can truly "know" things, since they don't have beliefs in the same way humans do - they're pattern matching systems operating on statistical relationships in their training data. However, we might consider a more pragmatic interpretation: if an entity can reliably access and apply information to solve problems and engage in reasoning, does this constitute a form of knowing? LLMs can certainly do this, though in a way that's quite different from human cognition. Some key differences in how LLMs "know" things compared to humans: 1. LLMs don't have direct experience or sensory input - their "knowledge" comes entirely from training data 2. They don't build causal models of the world in the same way humans do 3. They can't update their knowledge through experience (though they can engage in reasoning about new information presented to them) 4. Their "knowledge" is encoded in neural network weights rather than in biological memory structures Perhaps instead of asking whether LLMs truly "know" things in the same way humans do, it might be more productive to consider what unique capabilities and limitations they have in processing and applying information. What's your perspective on this? Do you think there are important aspects of human knowing that I haven't considered?
January 30, 2025 at 7:12 AM
gregat.es
alright, Merriam-Webster's grammar & usage pages are so good
A screenshot of text. The text reads: "Which leads us to this concluding recommendation: use alright if you like it and don't care that it's not the favored form. There's nothing essentially wrong with it. Use all right if you need people to know that you know what's all right—at least according to your English teacher (and a lot of other folks)."
December 11, 2024 at 7:19 PM
gregat.es
feels great to finally track down a mysterious perf issue
A screenshot of output from a code benchmark. The function took around 25 milliseconds, and the output indicates that this is a -98.835% improvement from the previous run.
December 6, 2024 at 7:17 AM
gregat.es
looks like somebody's "ai" is clutching its pearls during the rooster verse
A screenshot of a song playing on Amazon Music. The song is "Old MacDonald" by Super Simple Songs. It has been labeled [Explicit].
December 4, 2024 at 4:35 AM
gregat.es
milk bread, faux-pickled carrots, roasted brussels sprouts, pecan pie
An image showing the foods described in the post.
November 29, 2024 at 12:18 AM
gregat.es
So the following #RustLang code executes successfully, for example:
A short rust program. The variable "a" is assigned 2f64.powi(53), "b" is assigned a + 1, and "c" is assigned a + 2. The program then asserts that a is equal to b, but a is not equal to c.
November 27, 2024 at 1:03 AM
gregat.es
A screenshot of text from the game Dwarf Fortress. The text reads: "It is snowing elf frozen blood!"
November 24, 2024 at 12:20 AM
gregat.es
Peak "eigh" occurred in 2019, the year in which the share of baby girls born in the US whose names contain that letter sequence reached 1%.
Graph of the share of baby girls born in the US whose name contains the letter sequence E-I-G-H by year. The share grew slowly from the 1950s to the 1980s, reached half a percent in the early 2000s, and then climbed sharply to 1% in 2019. It has begun to decline since then, but is still above 0.9%.
November 22, 2024 at 5:40 PM
gregat.es
android 15 added a new feature where if I want to turn off bluetooth, I also have to check another box attesting that no, I really want bluetooth off, please don't just turn it back on for me "helpfully"
Android 15 bluetooth settings. There are two toggles "Use Bluetooth" and "Automatically turn on tomorrow"
November 19, 2024 at 4:39 PM
gregat.es
My traffic poem:
Three lanes for pickup trucks, lift to the sky, Seven for SUVs, eyes on the phone, None for the cyclists, doomed to die, One for the asshole, speeding alone. He's the flow of traffic, don't impede that guy. One law to rule them all, one law to mind them, One law to bring them all and in the right lane bind them. He's the flow of traffic, don't impede that guy.
November 16, 2024 at 4:30 PM