If study after study shows what actually ends homelessness, it's worth asking: whose interests are served by keeping that truth obscured?

I believe the scientific term for them is “concentration camps.”

“If I am killed doing this, throw my body at the White House, martyr the shit out of me & raise hell. Do not be sad. Do not think I would do anything differently. I would do it over & over again — this is too important to sit down & shut up and not do anything.” www.mprnews.org/story/2026/0...

Highlighting the speaker who stood in front of the Surprise mayor and told him to consider what the Mayor of Ohrdruf must’ve thought before he died by suicide: “He might have thought ‘how is this my fault I had no jurisdiction over this’ maybe he said ‘this site was not subject to local zoning.’”

We can’t legislate greed out of people, but we can say, “There’s an additional cost for behaving this way because it’s risky for the rest of us,” and then use that revenue to fund programs to counteract the damage done by that vice. Just like with tobacco.

No more billionaires. Tax them out of existence and we’ll all be better for it. Even them.

At a certain point, a house full of old useless shit is just as valuable to the person living there as piles of money sitting in a bank account that couldn’t be emptied in a single lifetime.