Så ækelt, at et dansk universitet er indblandet i dén slags 🤬😬

Jep, lige de rigtige til at stå for et singleblinded studie, som enhver idiot kan gennemskue, at RFK udelukkende har finansieret mhp. at få "videnskabeligt" belæg for dén vaccinepraksis, han foretrækker.

Amerikansk artikel om det, obs Peter Aaby nu har udtalt, at det ér Bandim Health Project = ham og Stabell Benn, der skal udføre studiet:

www.cidrap.umn.edu/childhood-va...

There are still many ethical concerns. There's already a prospective randomized control that demonstrates superior outcomes with the birth dose.
share.google/gRDiPEu55iLz...

So if they don't write about it, we have a likely cause for that.

But then, CEPOS is very fond of Stabel Benn (of course) and as @sorenlarsen.bsky.social has brougt to my attension:

piopio.dk/berlingskes-...

With that (and the content of their other articles about Stabell Benn & co.) in mind, it would IMO be very strange if Weekendavisen don't find it concerning enough to look into, that RFK finances a vaccine study led by Stabell Benn and co.

And here's another one, where they focus on Stabell Benns relation to RFK, and how he's been using one of her studies to make a clame about a vaccine, without her publishing the results that could potientially show that his clame had no scientific evidence:

www.weekendavisen.dk/samfund/et-d...

Maybe Weekendavisen will criticize it? They've written a series of critical articles about Stabell Benn & co., this is one of them:

www.weekendavisen.dk/ideer/forsoe...

Yes, the sample sizes are small, but they are all below the 50% proportion of BA.3.2 that would mean this wave is being driven by the new variant. So there may be a BA.3.2 wave after this wave. We will see...