OMG
gullimog.bsky.social
OMG
@gullimog.bsky.social
Black Lives Matter.
Capitalism is bad actually.
"Woke" = fairness & equality.
TRAHR✊🏳️‍⚧️
Cats rule & dogs drool... and drool... and drool... 😁
😬🤢🤮🤮🤮
January 16, 2025 at 5:40 PM
I have never seen any evidence of anyone under the age of 18 having gender affirming genital surgery. It seems mastectomies are the only "major" surgery offered to adolescents/teens (not counting facial surgery as major) and they are rare. Are there any examples of genital surgery on under 18s?
December 16, 2024 at 5:42 PM
"There is no such thing as society"

This is literally the rich gaslighting the poor. Rich people cannot be rich without the rest of society to profit off. They then deny society exists as a strategy to lock poor people into a role where they can continue to profit off them.
December 16, 2024 at 5:31 PM
Isn't stopping HRT dead after a long time taking it a serious health risk in itself?
December 16, 2024 at 10:45 AM
What a surprise. She's doing this more b/c she's an attention hound who wants to stand out than b/c it's something she firmly believes.

I'm not sure which is worse tbh, exposing people to violence & hatred b/c you're intolerant of them, OR doing it just to improve your career. Both are repulsive.🤮
December 12, 2024 at 12:06 PM
Fact is some things should simply not be for profit businesses, and healthcare is definitely one of them.

Same applies to most essential public services, tbh. No one should be getting rich off people's fundamental needs - it's totally immoral.
December 11, 2024 at 12:06 PM
I keep saying this. I wish someone had been able to organize a large protest for the FWS case.

It's really time that as many trans people & allies as possible gather & make their voices heard.

I hope next times there's a trans court case, parliamentary vote, or similar many many 1000s will gather.
December 11, 2024 at 11:58 AM
Maybe. Hard to tell. Most of the idiots on Twitter seem like bots to me.🤷‍♀️
December 10, 2024 at 5:54 PM
Did mommy not give you the nipple enough? Is that why you're here?
December 10, 2024 at 5:53 PM
These freaks are coming here from Twitter just b/c they want to abuse & upset people - how sad can you get?
December 10, 2024 at 3:40 PM
Ohhh... looking forward to this one!! But are there really many Potter fans left who don't kinda hate JKR now? It seems all the real dedicated fans had no time for her terfery, maybe with the exception of 30+ year old reactionary lads (usually from the US in my experience).
December 10, 2024 at 1:27 PM
...why Harry Potter especially appealed to LGBTQ+ youth b/c of that.

The problem is that ultimately they don't dismantle or challenge that exclusionary status quo, they just join it.

It's too much to parse for younger fans, but imo it does reveal her current GC arc is not so out of character.🤷‍♀️
December 10, 2024 at 12:30 PM
...same. Keracher isn't freed. Hermione becomes minister & Harry an Auror.

It's a very neolib conservative mindset - power structures & institutions aren't to blame, just bad individuals.

Harry & entourage are framed as being misfits, existing outside the status quo. And it's SO understandable...
December 10, 2024 at 12:28 PM
...regressive/reactionary & these things are in tension with each other the entire time.

It seems like she sets up a reckoning for the entire wizarding world, the abuse & failings of institutions like the Ministry but none of it ever pays off. Nothing actually changes, the systems remain the...
December 10, 2024 at 12:27 PM
...these innate biological qualities, and her heroes & narrative never challenge these ideas, they're just accepted as fact.

I absolutely agree that JK was TRYING to write a story about love, tolerance & acceptance and overcoming prejudice.

The problem is her real world beliefs & politics are...
December 10, 2024 at 12:25 PM
...of biological essentialism (that people are "born" a certain way) is at the root of much real-world bigotry like racism & misogyny.

And rather than challenge these very toxic & harmful beliefs in the books, JK promotes & reinforces them. Many of her fantasy races are written as possessing...
December 10, 2024 at 12:24 PM
...point that Dobby was a weirdo for wanting to be free.

She doesn't frame house elf slavery as them accepting their oppression, but rather as an innate characteristic of their species. She did the same with Goblins - they are a certain way b/c that is the "nature" of Goblins.

This flawed idea...
December 10, 2024 at 12:23 PM
The Dobby arc is fine imo and absolutely works, and if she'd made it so in her world only "bad" wizards like the Malfoys had house elves it would have worked.

But she didn't, all wizards have slaves, even Molly wishes she had one, and that's where the problems start. Hagrid even says at one...
December 10, 2024 at 12:22 PM
...she's always been incredibly insecure & unable to deal with criticism. She seems to have this need to validate herself & double-down rather than ever just say, "I was wrong".

I feel that might (at least partly) even explain her fall into terfdom & increasing radicalisation as a GC.
December 9, 2024 at 3:28 PM
...this case I'm rly not seeing one.

It doesn't help that since JKs turn to terfdom I have trouble trusting her word on anything. She's proven herself so bad faith & duplicitous recently, for me it calls into question everything she's ever said.

I genuinely believe that since the Potter days...
December 9, 2024 at 3:27 PM
...was meant to represent how JK felt mocked/disrespected in social services, wouldn't there be some point when the narration should side SPEW? But it rly feels as if the book also wants us to mock SPEW & Hermione like Ron & Harry do.

I'm interested to hear any other interpretation but NGL in...
December 9, 2024 at 3:26 PM
...it really does feel like JK was just mad at being criticized for (even good) wizards having house elf slaves so threw her toys out the pram to try & justify it.

I don't remember any moment where Hermione & SPEW are validated at all, it all just seems like relentless mockery. Even if SPEW...
December 9, 2024 at 3:25 PM
...with SPEW is that it's only function in the books seems to be the butt of jokes. There's never a moment where the narration sides with SPEW, or validates Hermione's perspective. Even Harry, our hero, rolls his eyes when Hermione mentions it.

Combined with the very "YIKES" Winky subplot...
December 9, 2024 at 3:24 PM
I definitely agree that online criticism is a mixed bag and often drifts into silly nitpicking rather than thoughtful, big picture analysis. Theres a lot of Potter criticisms I don't agree with myself.

That said I'm not sure I see your perspective on SPEW. The problem I think most people have...
December 9, 2024 at 3:23 PM