People use THAT as an example of "art is meaningless"?
What?!?
You stretch deep into history to pull out a 100 year old example of a now rather niche thing pretty much only known by art historians (because of the story and how important it is). And you don't know the context surrounding it?
People use THAT as an example of "art is meaningless"?
What?!?
You stretch deep into history to pull out a 100 year old example of a now rather niche thing pretty much only known by art historians (because of the story and how important it is). And you don't know the context surrounding it?