*wink wink nudge nudge*
LightNews LightNews
banner
ha-ha-69.bsky.social
*wink wink nudge nudge*
@ha-ha-69.bsky.social
9 followers 37 following 16 posts
Memes, wholesome stuff, and adult reblogs.
(I will block if you are under 18, or removed if age isn't visible) I was born in 2002
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
spicymancer.bsky.social
Red & Green
February 9, 2026 at 9:04 PM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
emrys.gay
Just got this email back. Don't use email, use their form: support.discord.com/hc/en-us/req...

If you haven't used their support portal, you may need to request activation and use the email you have associated with your disc account.

Hit the same points as you would in an email, tips below ⬇️
February 9, 2026 at 4:35 PM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
legendofnerd.bsky.social
Discord is already starting to walk things back a little, so people should keep doing what they're doing (cancel Nitro, leave feedback/criticism, direct contact through support tickets/phone/email/etc)
Tl;dr: The vast majority of adults will never have to interact with our age assurance systems and their experience won't change, because we know Discord and how people use it, so we're designing to respect privacy and deliver a safer experience while minimizing friction for adults. Hey folks – I’ve been on Discord since very early 2016 and actually joined the company in 2017. Safety is one of my areas, so today’s announcement on our blog is something I’ve been pretty involved with. I’ve always cared about Discord's approach to privacy (E2EE for A/V was another of my projects here), so I figured I’d add some more context to today's news. I can say confidently that the vast majority of people will never see age verification. I say this because we launched age assurance in the UK and Australia in 2025, and we have some pretty good data on this now. The idea here is that we can pre-identify most adults based on what we already know (not including your messages!), and that looks to get us pretty far here. No face scans, no IDs, for the vast majority of adults. And if you are one of the smaller subset of folks that we can't definitively pre-identify, then still, you only have to do it if you're accessing age-restricted servers or channels, or changing certain settings. That's really not most users. (Altho... might be more Redditors, tbh.) Last, I know that there is concern about privacy and data leaks. That's a real concern. The selfie system is built purely client-side, it never leaves your device, and we did that intentionally. That'll work for a bunch of users who aren't pre-identified as adults. But if you do end up in the ID bucket, then yeah, you're right that has some risk. We're doing what we can to minimize this by working with our range of partners (who are different partners than the data leak you read about), and if it's any help, we learned a lot internally from the last issue. But I get if that doesn't necessarily inspire more confidence. Anyway, we’ll be sharing more next month as we get closer to the global roll out about the system, including the technology behind it in March. I honestly wouldn't be happy if we didn't build something good and I am excited about what we’re launching, but please let us know what you think when we share more details. And I really appreciate everybody's feedback here today. We’re definitely reading it!
February 10, 2026 at 1:43 AM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
risquedraws.bsky.social
Pinup Maker 🍑 | 1-17-26
risquedraws.itch.io/pinup-gal-1-...

Make your own and share wherever you'd like! 💖 You can also try out my unreleased games early if you join my $1 Patreon😉
February 1, 2026 at 8:03 PM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
happyroadkill.bsky.social
average conspiracy cycle when it’s actually real
February 1, 2026 at 9:36 PM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
nsfsanti.bsky.social
Clara's Journey 7: Confide in him 5/5
January 31, 2026 at 5:08 PM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
pudge.bsky.social
Concept work for a big commission.
January 31, 2026 at 3:35 AM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
jonasgoonface.bsky.social
If a were-pire tongued you down what neat tastes would he find on you?
a were-pire is fingering his friend Sid, licking his fingers, and describing their tastes "diesel fuel, buckthorn, coal dust, pancakes, dandelions, swamp mug, camp fires, cigarettes..."
July 31, 2025 at 6:23 PM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
spicymancer.bsky.social
Monster researcher Eclair (and @rammionn.bsky.social's Ellie!) study psionic cephalopods...
January 27, 2026 at 4:37 PM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
amras.me
Do you live in Washington State?

I need you to do two things:

1) Go here (app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?...) & read HB 2112.
2) Go here (app.leg.wa.gov/pbc/bill/2112) & leave a comment urging your representatives to vote AGAINST the bill.

This is SERIOUS shit. Please!

My comment in the BLUE images.
I write to you today to STRONGLY OPPOSE House Bill 2112 (2026) and urge you to vote against this measure in your assembly. While I appreciate the impetus behind the Bill, it will not accomplish its goals and will only serve to criminalize speech which is protected by the United States Constitution. Firstly, and foremost, it is the responsibility of parents to police the actions of their children, to prevent them from accessing objectionable content online, and protect them from harm. This is a PARENTING PROBLEM and nearly every internet enabled hardware device comes with built-in content controls ("Parental Controls") designed to accomplish this level of content filtering and control. The legislature should not be imposing regulation on private individuals—the adults legally accessing the "objectionable content" defined in HB2112—to address a parenting problem. Encourage parents to be more involved and engaged in their children's lives, to employ the tools available to them, and to restrict access to devices and internet access inappropriate for their children. Secondly, imposing compliance with age verification software on all Internet sites that display images defined within the Bill is a fundamental invasion of privacy. While Section 2.2 states that identifying information may not be retained, that simply isn't practical and, if audited by the State, presents logistical challenges for said verifiers. The verification process would also create a "paper trail" through computer log data with which the State could potentially link verification queries with individuals and sites, building profiles on individuals, which is inappropriate and grotesque! Thirdly, Section 1.7(c) of the Bill is ambiguous and subjective, without exception for amateur expression. Who is to say what works of art, by which artists, is of merit? Who will be the arbiter of "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value"? This is not a sufficient definition of acceptability. It's dangerous, McCarthy-esque language.  Look, I'm sure you're getting a lot of these messages right now, and I appreciate that your staff is busy and possibly overwhelmed with work. This is a bad bill that will not accomplish its objectives of making the internet safer for children. The reality is that the internet is not a safe place for children to spend time unsupervised and without content restrictions. Parents need to use the tools available to them—on their children's devices, laptops, home wifi routers, etc.—to make the content restrictions necessary to protect their children as they see fit. It is not the place of the Legislature to impose mass content restriction on everyone "for the children" when the solution is far simpler and already exists. I sincerely urge you to vote against this bill. Thank you for your service to your communities and the State of Washington.
January 22, 2026 at 8:16 PM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
nsfsanti.bsky.social
January art is up yessiiirrrrr 🫡 deer girl and hunter make a return
January 23, 2026 at 10:35 PM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
nsfsanti.bsky.social
in lieu of these two making their return to my patreon here's the uncensored version of last year's art
January 23, 2026 at 10:40 PM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
jonasgoonface.bsky.social
Warren and Sid singing a ten minute Meatloaf song at Karaoke.
Warren, a half-vampire-half-werewolf, is singing a karaoke duet with sid, a dirty oogle. They're both only wearing slutty daisy dukes and the number is "bat out of hell" by Meatloaf and boy they're really going forrit
May 10, 2025 at 2:57 PM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
lekroox.bsky.social
That's the actual not safe for work content!
—
| Patreon | Website | Email List |
January 19, 2026 at 9:50 PM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
cinnabus.bsky.social
Wish Auntie Noir a happy birthday 🩷
January 16, 2026 at 3:53 AM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
huffslove.bsky.social
Arm-Armor if you will
January 14, 2026 at 4:56 PM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
lekroox.bsky.social
Your palate hasn't lived until you've sampled the buffet at the Slagator's Pits 'n Tits.
—
| Patreon | Website | Email List |
January 7, 2026 at 9:24 PM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
nagainoart.bsky.social
Thik! ✨
1 2 3
August 14, 2025 at 1:12 PM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
awd.bsky.social
Based on something someone showed me that was posted by @/b_president9 on that other plac.
December 31, 2025 at 4:34 AM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
nsfsanti.bsky.social
In love with it ❤️
January 4, 2025 at 5:17 PM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
nsfsanti.bsky.social
On Nymphs and Minotaurs 🐂🍃1/2
Winner of the March art poll last year on patreon!
February 8, 2025 at 7:59 PM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
nsfsanti.bsky.social
Miss Ma'am... 😳 February's art poll winner was 'Vampire bite that makes you cum'! Uncensored is on Patreon ❤️
March 1, 2025 at 6:59 PM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
nsfsanti.bsky.social
Two new friends joining Ianthe in this hot little one page comic :) ❤️
June 14, 2025 at 2:12 PM
Reposted by *wink wink nudge nudge*
nsfsanti.bsky.social
an oldie uncensored for yall, as a treat 🫶
August 2, 2025 at 4:01 PM