Steve P 🔶️
@hammerdoc.bsky.social
Chemicals regulatory professional. Pro-EU. Finally made the leap from the Musk hellhole!
#FBPE
#FBPE
I think a "Tales from the count" memoir would work well!
December 3, 2025 at 9:02 AM
I think a "Tales from the count" memoir would work well!
I was at the count in 2024. One of the spoiled ballots consisted of an arrow pointing to Gullis' name, with the words "Especially not this c*nt"...
December 3, 2025 at 7:09 AM
I was at the count in 2024. One of the spoiled ballots consisted of an arrow pointing to Gullis' name, with the words "Especially not this c*nt"...
At least he didn't go on InfoWars to spread antisemitic conspiracy theories with Alex Jones.
Oh, wait...
www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
Oh, wait...
www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
Farage urged to explain conspiracy theories linked to antisemitism he voiced in US media
Exclusive: The Reform UK leader discussed far-right talking points in web TV and radio appearances between 2009 and 2018
www.theguardian.com
November 28, 2025 at 2:58 PM
At least he didn't go on InfoWars to spread antisemitic conspiracy theories with Alex Jones.
Oh, wait...
www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
Oh, wait...
www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
Green Day
Nick Cave & the Bad Seeds
Faith No More
Soundgarden
Manic Street Preachers
Nick Cave & the Bad Seeds
Faith No More
Soundgarden
Manic Street Preachers
November 28, 2025 at 2:45 PM
Green Day
Nick Cave & the Bad Seeds
Faith No More
Soundgarden
Manic Street Preachers
Nick Cave & the Bad Seeds
Faith No More
Soundgarden
Manic Street Preachers
I remember the good old days when she was referred to as "Mad Mel" by pretty much anyone who ever heard her speak...
November 25, 2025 at 6:57 PM
I remember the good old days when she was referred to as "Mad Mel" by pretty much anyone who ever heard her speak...
You spelt "challenge scientific orthodoxy" wrong. It should be "promote batshit fuckwittery".
November 22, 2025 at 8:47 PM
You spelt "challenge scientific orthodoxy" wrong. It should be "promote batshit fuckwittery".
Heh, just happened again! Need to check a bit more often!
November 21, 2025 at 9:01 AM
Heh, just happened again! Need to check a bit more often!
Last couple of times I looked at the live text coverage there's been another wicket. Hope it continues!
November 21, 2025 at 8:04 AM
Last couple of times I looked at the live text coverage there's been another wicket. Hope it continues!
Good riddance. Should never have been in the party in the first place.
November 16, 2025 at 4:45 PM
Good riddance. Should never have been in the party in the first place.
You really need to stop digging. You're now Yaxley-Lennon with a red rosette.
November 16, 2025 at 12:17 PM
You really need to stop digging. You're now Yaxley-Lennon with a red rosette.
You must be really proud...
November 16, 2025 at 11:40 AM
You must be really proud...
You really want Farage to be the next PM, don't you?
November 16, 2025 at 8:43 AM
You really want Farage to be the next PM, don't you?
Congratulations Liam. Such recognition is well deserved.
November 13, 2025 at 8:03 AM
Congratulations Liam. Such recognition is well deserved.
Ooh, I love a drop of Pride when I'm in London. I don't get down there very often though...
November 7, 2025 at 2:54 PM
Ooh, I love a drop of Pride when I'm in London. I don't get down there very often though...
Can confirm it's not me, because nobody knows me as "Steve, from the pub"...
November 7, 2025 at 9:53 AM
Can confirm it's not me, because nobody knows me as "Steve, from the pub"...
Any chance of actually engaging rather than posting a sarcastic eyeroll?
November 1, 2025 at 12:30 AM
Any chance of actually engaging rather than posting a sarcastic eyeroll?
You could argue that they've gone from promoting thinness to promoting thinness (with a brief spell of relative sanity in between), which would indeed make it a 360...
...but unfortunately the Graun hasn't made that argument and you are therefore 100% correct.
...but unfortunately the Graun hasn't made that argument and you are therefore 100% correct.
November 1, 2025 at 12:28 AM
You could argue that they've gone from promoting thinness to promoting thinness (with a brief spell of relative sanity in between), which would indeed make it a 360...
...but unfortunately the Graun hasn't made that argument and you are therefore 100% correct.
...but unfortunately the Graun hasn't made that argument and you are therefore 100% correct.
Lib Dems could do more on Social media for sure.
However, it's no substitute for putting in the legwork and knocking on doors. Real-life conversations make all the difference.
However, it's no substitute for putting in the legwork and knocking on doors. Real-life conversations make all the difference.
November 1, 2025 at 12:15 AM
Lib Dems could do more on Social media for sure.
However, it's no substitute for putting in the legwork and knocking on doors. Real-life conversations make all the difference.
However, it's no substitute for putting in the legwork and knocking on doors. Real-life conversations make all the difference.
The "two party system" was smashed last year.
If 46 Labour MPs defected, the Lib Dems would be the official Opposition (and Labour would still have a very sizeable majority).
And guess who's winning most of the council by-elections this year?
If 46 Labour MPs defected, the Lib Dems would be the official Opposition (and Labour would still have a very sizeable majority).
And guess who's winning most of the council by-elections this year?
November 1, 2025 at 12:11 AM
The "two party system" was smashed last year.
If 46 Labour MPs defected, the Lib Dems would be the official Opposition (and Labour would still have a very sizeable majority).
And guess who's winning most of the council by-elections this year?
If 46 Labour MPs defected, the Lib Dems would be the official Opposition (and Labour would still have a very sizeable majority).
And guess who's winning most of the council by-elections this year?
Selection criteria depends on the polling company - they usually disclose it on their website.
I'd love to see some polling that properly examines whether people would consider voting tactically, why, and who they'd consider voting for.
I'd love to see some polling that properly examines whether people would consider voting tactically, why, and who they'd consider voting for.
October 25, 2025 at 8:09 AM
Selection criteria depends on the polling company - they usually disclose it on their website.
I'd love to see some polling that properly examines whether people would consider voting tactically, why, and who they'd consider voting for.
I'd love to see some polling that properly examines whether people would consider voting tactically, why, and who they'd consider voting for.
He's right, but for the wrong reason.
We've had too many "unifiers" legitimising the loathsome toad.
We've had too many "unifiers" legitimising the loathsome toad.
October 24, 2025 at 11:15 PM
He's right, but for the wrong reason.
We've had too many "unifiers" legitimising the loathsome toad.
We've had too many "unifiers" legitimising the loathsome toad.
Voters don't necessarily lie. When asked who they would vote for in a hypothetical election, they tend to tell the truth.
That doesn't reflect reality though. When push comes to shove, there are plenty who will vote tactically. Most polls miss this because they ask the wrong questions.
That doesn't reflect reality though. When push comes to shove, there are plenty who will vote tactically. Most polls miss this because they ask the wrong questions.
October 24, 2025 at 11:01 PM
Voters don't necessarily lie. When asked who they would vote for in a hypothetical election, they tend to tell the truth.
That doesn't reflect reality though. When push comes to shove, there are plenty who will vote tactically. Most polls miss this because they ask the wrong questions.
That doesn't reflect reality though. When push comes to shove, there are plenty who will vote tactically. Most polls miss this because they ask the wrong questions.