To answer her question: No. I would not expect them to be blown up like that in similar situations. We have lots of experience with interdiction in those areas. They weren't an IMMINENT threat to anyone or in danger of escaping.
To answer her question: No. I would not expect them to be blown up like that in similar situations. We have lots of experience with interdiction in those areas. They weren't an IMMINENT threat to anyone or in danger of escaping.
Removing a battery from a bike designed around having one one doesn't suggest anything.
Removing a battery from a bike designed around having one one doesn't suggest anything.
So no evidence of harm makes it hard to convict on a charge that rests on harm being done.
So no evidence of harm makes it hard to convict on a charge that rests on harm being done.
And there may be a disparity in the number of poorer reps, so you may actually price out folks, artificially skewing votes towards one side or the other.
Seems like a bad idea
And there may be a disparity in the number of poorer reps, so you may actually price out folks, artificially skewing votes towards one side or the other.
Seems like a bad idea
"All the animals at the Zoo and at the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute in Front Royal, Virginia, will continue to be fed and cared for. A shutdown will not affect our commitment to the safety of our staff and standard of excellence in animal care."
"All the animals at the Zoo and at the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute in Front Royal, Virginia, will continue to be fed and cared for. A shutdown will not affect our commitment to the safety of our staff and standard of excellence in animal care."
So my question is... does anyone have an example of a Democrat making a similar kind of joke about causing harm to those they're directly in power over, and being given a pass?
So my question is... does anyone have an example of a Democrat making a similar kind of joke about causing harm to those they're directly in power over, and being given a pass?
I see "don't treat 24 year olds as youths", which seems reasonable. And taking away discretion, which is bad, sure. But neither of those are what was I saw being talked about in relation to Trump.
Which part of this is promoting the occupation?
I see "don't treat 24 year olds as youths", which seems reasonable. And taking away discretion, which is bad, sure. But neither of those are what was I saw being talked about in relation to Trump.
Which part of this is promoting the occupation?
Maybe we're rising faster (I don't know), but I doubt it's as simple as this.
Maybe we're rising faster (I don't know), but I doubt it's as simple as this.
And letting the voters choose to change how the voters want to select maps seems like a reasonable thing.
And letting the voters choose to change how the voters want to select maps seems like a reasonable thing.