No i’m not, and no we are not, and you know. If you dont know the term «projection» you can google it, its a psychological term giving information on the sender of it. To read both parts of a post before you rush into answering, might also help your understanding. All the best though ;)

I think you know that a full, formal federal investigation of the voting machines has not yet been launched, although prominent experts and watchdog groups have publicly demanded one, and related lawsuits are pushing the matter into the courts. So i guess well see if we ever will know..

Really?.. So while your president is trying to steal voter data and more (gerrymandering etc), wich i assume you know, you are mostly bussy trying to prove theres non proof of nothing and denying cheating can happen in the US .. right? Your kind of proving my point. But ok..

With all due respect, your reaction is only helping Trump. You know he would cheat if he could, the system are being rigged as we speak, hopefully they want succeeed, but denying the possibility of it even happening would be awfly stupid and naiv. Sorry..

By posting this he by the way not only affects his followers to favoritt his ideas, but also gather opposition among non-Trumpers against such a theory, making them less likely to be follow-up or investigate if such signs of manipulation should occur.

You follow his projections to figure it out. He has already posted his recipe for the election here:

Naiv is US letting a guy who was under investigation for a coup attempt, run again. What could possibly go wrong by giving him the oppurtunity again..

Jack Smith testifies there was "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" that Trump committed crimes