Then she would not actually be his parent. Chances are the next of kin would probably take the sun like a grandma or a cousin or something. So while you're focusing on the semantics of Orphan which technically apply here there's a whole legal process that you're just ignoring.

But working yourself up into such a frenzy over what essentially amounts to a perceived slight is not going to help anyone. You're arguing about how things are worded as if there isn't a lot to indicate that orphan might be an accurate label. Especially since if she didn't adopt the kid

That's the thing you keep saying lying like they're actively trying to deceive people. And you're right the adoptive status of her son is not public knowledge which means legally she might not be his parent and therefore orphan isn't inaccurate. I understand wanting to validate queer experiences

There is a lot of erasure but a. Kids bio parents are both passed so orphan isnt inaccurate b. Youre performative outrage doesnt help anyone. Everyone knows shes a lesbian. Also did her partner offically adopt the kids? Thats actually very important. Even if they were married she would need to adopt

Youre arguing semantics when a woman had been murdered......a child still lost their mother. Youre focusing on the wrong issue. You seem more upset by the words used and not the literal dead mother.

A mom is still dead

They/them here for some may/hem

Wow, all this trauma right in front of my tamagotchi?

It's amazing how he can go from hot to even hotter

🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵

I'm hoping so.

Exactly!

Bbno$