banner
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang
@harriswang.bsky.social
1.7K followers 390 following 29 posts
Professor and Interim Chair | Dept. of Systems Biology | Columbia University | Synthetic Biology | Microbiome | Genome Engineering http://wanglab.c2b2.columbia.edu
wanglab.c2b2.columbia.edu
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Jun 25
Grateful to work with the wonderful
@vilcekfoundation.bsky.social and the super talented Hiroki Otsuka on a short manga highlighting our research and my journey as an immigrant scientist! 🧪🦠🧬
vilcek.org/news/microbe...
Biographical Manga Highlights Scientist Harris Wang’s Superhero Microbiome Work
Discover how immigrant scientist Harris Wang, PhD, uses synthetic biology to reprogram gut bacteria in this manga by Hiroki Otsuka.
vilcek.org
7
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Jun 25
Grateful to work with the wonderful
@vilcekfoundation.bsky.social and the super talented Hiroki Otsuka on a short manga highlighting our research and my journey as an immigrant scientist! 🧪🦠🧬
vilcek.org/news/microbe...
Biographical Manga Highlights Scientist Harris Wang’s Superhero Microbiome Work
Discover how immigrant scientist Harris Wang, PhD, uses synthetic biology to reprogram gut bacteria in this manga by Hiroki Otsuka.
vilcek.org
7
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · May 5
Congrats Bryan!!
1
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Feb 8
Yikes… NIH dropping IC to 15%
grants.nih.gov/grants/guide...
NOT-OD-25-068: Supplemental Guidance to the 2024 NIH Grants Policy Statement: Indirect Cost Rates
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts: Supplemental Guidance to the 2024 NIH Grants Policy Statement: Indirect Cost Rates NOT-OD-25-068. OD
grants.nih.gov
1 4
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Feb 3
Happy to share our new paper in @naturemicrobiol.bsky.social on mapping spatial relationships of the human gut microbiome. We identified distinct spatial hubs between gut bacteria that reflect sub-community assemblies at the micron-scale. Led by Miles Richardson & co.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
SAMPL-seq reveals micron-scale spatial hubs in the human gut microbiome - Nature Microbiology
Split-And-pool Metagenomic Plot-sampling sequencing (SAMPL-seq) can be applied to complex microbial communities to reveal spatial co-localization of microbes at the micron scale.
www.nature.com
36 90
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Dec 16
I hear ya! I mean more on the “we” rather than “I” personally in some of these sentiments. Again, this is not meant as a substitute for things we do or aught to do already but something that can augment. Also, just an idea to stimulate conversations.
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Dec 15
I like your ideas, just trying to think of ways that I can donate my “time” to help specific labs/areas that might even be outside of my immediate area of expertise. Seems like having a universal currency for science might have some uses. It’s obviously imperfect, but maybe could refine the ideas.
1
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Dec 15
I think the idea is that you can compensate others with your credits/tokens like pay for reagents (service contracts on equipment!!). There are lots of misc expenses in running a lab that add up!
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Dec 15
May not push the incentives to a point where people will review more, but at least extend the effort of the review to benefit not only the authors (or the journals) but broaden impact to others through the peer review process. It’s like volunteering time and using earned credits to give to others.
1
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Dec 12
Looks like there is some momentum to this concept: www.nature.com/articles/d41...
‘Getting paid to review is justice’: journal pays peer reviewers in cryptocurrency
ResearchHub Journal launches latest attempt to compensate referees for their labour.
www.nature.com
1 3
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Nov 30
The problem is that people don’t have time to review. It’s not clear how you easily “fact check” papers in bio (unless there are massive flaws). Critiques of strengths & weaknesses are still useful. Most people aren’t volunteering time to review biorxiv papers. Maybe this system can be an incentive.
1
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Nov 30
Credits used back to invest in science community rather than on direct personal benefit.
1 2
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Nov 30
I recognize that this idea is still underdeveloped but wanted to start share it here. Would love to hear feedback and find people willing to help do something like this! Thanks for reading! (9/9)
3 8
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Nov 30
I can imagine this framework on a blockchain to track credits or tokens and you can have people invest in buying the tokens directly to further add to this community (basically a donation). Lots of ways to grow this organically. The economics need to be figured out in more detail. (8/9)
2 2
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Nov 30
Importantly you can DONATE these credits to other labs or entities. What if there’s a cool project from another lab that I want to support? I can donate my science credits to them so it can advance the science. You basically converted ↔️ PR time/effort into communal goods for sharing w/ others. (7/9)
1 7
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Nov 30
The SOLUTION:💡What if we gave reviewers some type of “science credits” after peer review. Sci-credits can be exchanged for all kinds of science related activities. For example: publication fees, society/conference fees, discount on purchasing reagents or repair cost of equipment. (6/9)
3 12
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Nov 30
The NEED: a fair, equitable, and transparent framework to compensate referee’s time and effort in peer review 👍. This could help make PR higher quality, attract better reviews and more motivated reviewers (maybe?) (5/9)
1 8
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Nov 30
Direct cash 💵 compensation for PR is not good as it has obvious perverse incentives. But most people hate to review a paper (for “free”) and then later get charged $10k+ to publish in a journal. Some journals have small discounts, but those don’t move the needle. (4/9)
1 6
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Nov 30
But most referees 🧑‍💻 agree to review a paper out of sense of duty, perceived obligation to the journal/editor, the topic area, the specific paper, or even the authors (or combo of the above). Some people do more PR than others. Most people I know don’t review 3x the # of papers they publish/yr. (3/9)
1 6
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Nov 30
The PROBLEM: Peer review (PR) is poorly incentivized. Reviewing papers take time, no one has time⌛️, and referees don’t get properly compensated for this work (often hours to days, stretched over months to years). People participate in PR because it’s a ‘communal good’ to keep science going. (2/9)
1 7
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Nov 30
💡💥Here’s a modest proposal I’ve been pondering for a while on how to change the PEER REVIEW process and start more community-driven SCIENCE FUNDING. Lots of feedback/discussion welcomed! Other variants of the idea might exist already—not claiming originality. (a long 🧵) (1/9)
8 14 43
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Nov 29
Email me if you want to chat! One key thing is to serially wash a few times by resuspending the filtered cells off the filter. I recall membrane filters (polycarbonate, laser etched) work a lot better than depth filters (nylons, PE, etc). I tried a bunch of different filters to get one that worked.
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Nov 27
You can wash a Ecoli culture from LB well enough to get rid of all the media and do electroporation (very sensitive to salts) so it’s quite doable. We used this design to build out the MAGE2.0 machine at the Wyss Institute. I can send you unpublished chapter from my thesis if you want more details.
1 2
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Nov 27
I have your answer: Use sterile 0.22um filter (polycarbonate or PP) filter plates with a vacuum manifold. You can filter about 2-3ml of OD~1 cells (~2-3x10^9) before the filter gets clogged. You can wash cells directly on filter membrane by resuspension with multichannel pipette.
1 6
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Nov 19
I generally avoid service contracts. If I need them that much then the instrument is probably not that reliable… only exception is Illumina sequencers, which are built to break and hook you on the service contract.
1 2
harriswang.bsky.social
Harris Wang @harriswang.bsky.social · Nov 19
One under-appreciated challenge of mid-career PI’s is that after a decade or more, the big equipments you originally bought all break down and need replacement. People don’t necessarily have discretionary funds at this point and it’s hard to bootstrap through grants.
3 6 41