@hedzer.bsky.social
I was disputing your assertion that there is years of counselling before drugs/surgeries are used.
That’s just not true.
That’s just not true.
June 19, 2025 at 10:10 PM
I was disputing your assertion that there is years of counselling before drugs/surgeries are used.
That’s just not true.
That’s just not true.
“When gender dysphoric patients who received surgeries were compared to those who did not have surgeries, there was no statistically significant difference in their mental health utilization (Figure 1).”
segm.org/ajp_correcti...
segm.org/ajp_correcti...
Correction of a Key Study: No Evidence of “Gender-Affirming” Surgeries Improving Mental Health
In October 2019, the American Journal of Psychiatry (AJP) published a study from the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, and the Yale School of Public Health which reported that “gender-affirming" surgeri...
segm.org
June 19, 2025 at 10:08 PM
“When gender dysphoric patients who received surgeries were compared to those who did not have surgeries, there was no statistically significant difference in their mental health utilization (Figure 1).”
segm.org/ajp_correcti...
segm.org/ajp_correcti...
“however, the literature to date suffers from a lack of methodological rigor that increases the risk of type I error”.
There isn’t enough long term studies to empirically prove this.
There isn’t enough long term studies to empirically prove this.
June 19, 2025 at 10:02 PM
“however, the literature to date suffers from a lack of methodological rigor that increases the risk of type I error”.
There isn’t enough long term studies to empirically prove this.
There isn’t enough long term studies to empirically prove this.
No, I’m saying you cannot BE the opposite sex. You can adopt a persona and present as the opposite sex, have surgical modifications, but you will not BE the opposite sex.
You still exist, the whole “so you’re saying trans people don’t exist” is a ridiculous argument
You still exist, the whole “so you’re saying trans people don’t exist” is a ridiculous argument
June 19, 2025 at 10:01 PM
No, I’m saying you cannot BE the opposite sex. You can adopt a persona and present as the opposite sex, have surgical modifications, but you will not BE the opposite sex.
You still exist, the whole “so you’re saying trans people don’t exist” is a ridiculous argument
You still exist, the whole “so you’re saying trans people don’t exist” is a ridiculous argument
All you have to do is google it…..
June 19, 2025 at 9:53 PM
All you have to do is google it…..
Weird because as time goes on, the opposite is showing to be true.
Thinking you are the opposite sex is a mental illness, because you cannot ever BE the opposite sex. It’s like claiming you’re Black when White: it’s impossible.
affirming the delusion does not help long term. It’s absurd.
Thinking you are the opposite sex is a mental illness, because you cannot ever BE the opposite sex. It’s like claiming you’re Black when White: it’s impossible.
affirming the delusion does not help long term. It’s absurd.
June 19, 2025 at 9:52 PM
Weird because as time goes on, the opposite is showing to be true.
Thinking you are the opposite sex is a mental illness, because you cannot ever BE the opposite sex. It’s like claiming you’re Black when White: it’s impossible.
affirming the delusion does not help long term. It’s absurd.
Thinking you are the opposite sex is a mental illness, because you cannot ever BE the opposite sex. It’s like claiming you’re Black when White: it’s impossible.
affirming the delusion does not help long term. It’s absurd.
Interesting you bring up Christian “indoctrination”. I happen to agree: there are no Christians kids, only the children of Christian affirming parents. There are no “trans” kids either, only the children of “trans” affirming parents.
No child can consent to either: Christianity, or “trans”.
No child can consent to either: Christianity, or “trans”.
June 19, 2025 at 9:47 PM
Interesting you bring up Christian “indoctrination”. I happen to agree: there are no Christians kids, only the children of Christian affirming parents. There are no “trans” kids either, only the children of “trans” affirming parents.
No child can consent to either: Christianity, or “trans”.
No child can consent to either: Christianity, or “trans”.
That’s simply not true.
June 19, 2025 at 9:44 PM
That’s simply not true.
It doesn’t matter what HC puts out. Canada is far behind the rest of the world when it comes to “transing” kids.
June 19, 2025 at 9:43 PM
It doesn’t matter what HC puts out. Canada is far behind the rest of the world when it comes to “transing” kids.
Puberty blockers are not reversible.
Boys cannot BE girls.
Surgery to physically alter a features and sex organs to look like the opposite sex should only be performed on those who are adults, not minors.
Children cannot consent
Boys cannot BE girls.
Surgery to physically alter a features and sex organs to look like the opposite sex should only be performed on those who are adults, not minors.
Children cannot consent
June 19, 2025 at 1:48 AM
Puberty blockers are not reversible.
Boys cannot BE girls.
Surgery to physically alter a features and sex organs to look like the opposite sex should only be performed on those who are adults, not minors.
Children cannot consent
Boys cannot BE girls.
Surgery to physically alter a features and sex organs to look like the opposite sex should only be performed on those who are adults, not minors.
Children cannot consent
Qatar has funnelled billions of dollars into the US over the last decade and more. Their financial influence far, far exceeds any “funding by Israel”.
It’s anywhere between 100 and 150 billion.
It’s anywhere between 100 and 150 billion.
June 19, 2025 at 1:44 AM
Qatar has funnelled billions of dollars into the US over the last decade and more. Their financial influence far, far exceeds any “funding by Israel”.
It’s anywhere between 100 and 150 billion.
It’s anywhere between 100 and 150 billion.
You do realize that the “if we don’t let kids transition they’ll commit suicide” talking point has been debunked, right?
June 19, 2025 at 1:41 AM
You do realize that the “if we don’t let kids transition they’ll commit suicide” talking point has been debunked, right?
Do you mean, can I define democracy? Yes, I can, and in no democratic nation does the State decide which journalists can cover the State.
June 19, 2025 at 1:34 AM
Do you mean, can I define democracy? Yes, I can, and in no democratic nation does the State decide which journalists can cover the State.
It’s not transphobic to say men are stronger, faster, and more agile than women. And no, men cannot be women, women cannot be men. Why is this even being debated?
June 19, 2025 at 1:28 AM
It’s not transphobic to say men are stronger, faster, and more agile than women. And no, men cannot be women, women cannot be men. Why is this even being debated?
Here’s Cochrane whining to the debate commission.
Unbelievable.
What is @CBC so afraid of?
x.com/cbcwatcher/s...
Unbelievable.
What is @CBC so afraid of?
x.com/cbcwatcher/s...
cbcwatcher on X: "Michel Cormier, Executive Director of the Debates Commission has to deal with a whining David Cochrane Cormier admits they were afraid to lose another court battle "We denied accreditation to Rebel media both in 2019 and 2021 because we didn't consider them to be actually to do https://t.co/0usB43fITE" / X
Michel Cormier, Executive Director of the Debates Commission has to deal with a whining David Cochrane Cormier admits they were afraid to lose another court battle "We denied accreditation to Rebel media both in 2019 and 2021 because we didn't consider them to be actually to do https://t.co/0usB43fITE
x.com
April 18, 2025 at 4:39 PM
Here’s Cochrane whining to the debate commission.
Unbelievable.
What is @CBC so afraid of?
x.com/cbcwatcher/s...
Unbelievable.
What is @CBC so afraid of?
x.com/cbcwatcher/s...
Your headline from the Deep Dive is misleading. It’s literal misinformation. What constitutes “journalism” is not based upon tax credit systems in Canada.
April 18, 2025 at 4:01 PM
Your headline from the Deep Dive is misleading. It’s literal misinformation. What constitutes “journalism” is not based upon tax credit systems in Canada.
The decision regarding Rebel News has solely to journalism tax credits, and
Judges found they did not meet the standards. I don’t have a problem with that, but this does not in any way = not journalism.
By definition, Rebel is a media outlet and they are journalists.
Judges found they did not meet the standards. I don’t have a problem with that, but this does not in any way = not journalism.
By definition, Rebel is a media outlet and they are journalists.
April 18, 2025 at 3:59 PM
The decision regarding Rebel News has solely to journalism tax credits, and
Judges found they did not meet the standards. I don’t have a problem with that, but this does not in any way = not journalism.
By definition, Rebel is a media outlet and they are journalists.
Judges found they did not meet the standards. I don’t have a problem with that, but this does not in any way = not journalism.
By definition, Rebel is a media outlet and they are journalists.
You can still view the video.
April 18, 2025 at 3:51 PM
You can still view the video.
By tax status definition?
Ok.
Ok.
April 18, 2025 at 1:40 PM
By tax status definition?
Ok.
Ok.
“Trumpism”.
Grow up.
Grow up.
April 18, 2025 at 1:40 PM
“Trumpism”.
Grow up.
Grow up.
There’s video.
Were you?
Were you?
April 18, 2025 at 1:38 PM
There’s video.
Were you?
Were you?
Ruling aside, Do you really want the government deciding what is/isn’t journalism?
Sounds kinda fash.
Sounds kinda fash.
April 18, 2025 at 1:37 PM
Ruling aside, Do you really want the government deciding what is/isn’t journalism?
Sounds kinda fash.
Sounds kinda fash.
I’m not “spinning”. But you are lol. Look at your source.
April 18, 2025 at 1:32 PM
I’m not “spinning”. But you are lol. Look at your source.