Helen Reynolds
@helenrey.bsky.social
1.1K followers 470 following 1.2K posts
Physics teacher, author of Activate/Oxford Revise Physics + others. Learning the foxtrot. Loves cogsci + joined up curriculum. Big fan of mini whiteboards. Owns It's A Learning Curve LLC https://itsalearningcurve.education All views my own.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
helenrey.bsky.social
Super excited to announce that I am now a company! My days teaching in a school are at an end.

My new venture is tutoring + providing professional development + outreach in physics and cogsci.

Here's the site - if you find anything amiss let me know! 😊
itsalearningcurve.education
It's a Learning Curve
itsalearningcurve.education
helenrey.bsky.social
Would seem like an eminently sensible idea to me. I hope there are data somewhere to show it?

What proportion of physics departments in the US do it?
helenrey.bsky.social
That is so cool!! Not that getting a PhD isn't cool, but yay for all those kiddos who will benefit from his passion for physics!!
Brilliant!!
helenrey.bsky.social
Excellent! Will add you to the list.
helenrey.bsky.social
Great!! Super excited... will add you to the list!
helenrey.bsky.social
Calling physics teachers!

I'd like to get together an online 'group' of people who teach physics AND also have an interest in cognitive science.

If that's you, let me know (DM or via my website)! I'd love to talk specifics, share ideas, discuss issues.

#iteachphysics
itsalearningcurve.education
It's a Learning Curve
itsalearningcurve.education
helenrey.bsky.social
Another summary! This time the marvellous Mental Models by Dr Jim Heal and Rebekah Berlin delving deep into developing students thinking, what it means and how to do it.

AND updated Cogsci Reading List - now up to 74 books.
itsalearningcurve.education/cogsci-book-...
helenrey.bsky.social
Ah, gotcha! That is a big step, and yay! So helpful if it can all be joined up!

If you need any ideas about that I'd love to help!
helenrey.bsky.social
Interesting!
Are you also talking about content with MS science teachers? Like doing free body diagrams, basics of reflection refraction, current and p.d?
They can do a lot in the 3/4 years of MS (we've had a knowledge-rich curriculum in our 5-8th grade for 4 years and it's awesome!)
#iteachphysics
helenrey.bsky.social
This kind of thing doesn't really help.
helenrey.bsky.social
The Most Persistent Myth... 'that (fill in the gap...) will revolutionize education'.

@veritasium.bsky.social , please you could you update your excellent video to include AI?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEmu...
The Most Persistent Myth
YouTube video by Veritasium
www.youtube.com
helenrey.bsky.social
Yay!! See you there!
helenrey.bsky.social
Best intro to a book about physics stuff...

So Planck should have had two constants... 🤷

#iteachphysics
helenrey.bsky.social
Exacerbated by the fact that potential/field/circuit mean completely different things in the 'real' world.
helenrey.bsky.social
Following on from the 'a physics teacher needs a large number of explanations for things' post, which are the topics/concepts that need the MOST?

Mine are:
#1 - potential
#2 - field
#3 - anything to do with circuits.

#iteachphysics
helenrey.bsky.social
I think there might be an element of mistake... but unfortunately if it doesn't seem to the student that it's an alternative then it really isn't?

It's pedagogical content knowledge, or lack there of. You need to have a bunch of analogies/think of it like this in you back pocket.
helenrey.bsky.social
Yes!! Of course! Great resource.

There's a lot of talk of checking for understanding, but explaining it well/differently in the first place is how that understanding happens!
helenrey.bsky.social
This.

"Humans who rely on an LLM to generate outputs for them do not understand those outputs well enough to do anything with them... the reliance on AI is preventing junior entrants into every field from developing the very skills they would need to check that AI’s work."
spavel.bsky.social
You might have heard AI boosters say: "it's okay that this tech is wrong half of the time, because the human operator 'partnering' with the LLM will catch errors."

Except no they fucking won't.

The actual context in which these systems are deployed make checking the AI's "work" impossible.
"Human in the loop" is a thought-terminating cliche
Without thoughtful guard rails, asking people to clean up after machines doesn't make machines better — it makes people worse.
productpicnic.beehiiv.com
helenrey.bsky.social
Thank you! It's super fun!
helenrey.bsky.social
When I told my classes I was leaving one student said (to general agreement) that the thing that they would miss most was how I said ....

Wonderful
@xkcd.com
helenrey.bsky.social
Good call! A really excellent challenge for students taking APC in their stride.