People don’t know what to think, this don’t want to.
People don’t know what to think, this don’t want to.
Actively protecting trans people is a loser. But *reactively* protecting trans people is a big winner!
I think it reflects society being unresolved. The winning reaction is against creative ways to punch trans people.
Actively protecting trans people is a loser. But *reactively* protecting trans people is a big winner!
I think it reflects society being unresolved. The winning reaction is against creative ways to punch trans people.
It’s possible that there is no ethical conclusion available from the original experiment: the result can’t guide action because it really can’t expand beyond “one headache, one set of diffuse gains”, which is by nature an action taken but once.
It’s possible that there is no ethical conclusion available from the original experiment: the result can’t guide action because it really can’t expand beyond “one headache, one set of diffuse gains”, which is by nature an action taken but once.
And maybe that calls the conclusion into question. We’re only happy with this result if we expect to not get the headache. But if we build society around passing out big headaches but even more tiny dopamine hits, we hate the result.
And maybe that calls the conclusion into question. We’re only happy with this result if we expect to not get the headache. But if we build society around passing out big headaches but even more tiny dopamine hits, we hate the result.