Whether they are elected or not is a seperate discussion, but until there is any change it remains their role & responsibility to scrutinise & suggest ammendments to bills.

I thinking's important to listen to all views, on both sides. Especially given many major disability groups have expressed their concerns regarding lack of safeguarding & risk of coercian. Scrutiny & discussion of the bill are essential.

Our gp online system works fine, for urgent & non urgent appts. If u can't fill in the form online u can ring or go in & they will do it for you.

I know, & its hard to avoid all the negativity! ....I have to distract by followering posters of art & many cats!😅

That is bad, i don't think bluesky is any better than the other side sometimes, just less traffic so not as awful, yet!

I'm on loads of lists, who knows why, I certainly don't! It upset me to start with but as I don't think I've ever interacted with any of the list creators I think the whole list thing is quite farcical🥰

A small friend
#whistpr

Award-winning monoprint artist Chloe Barnes tells us more about the process of creating this stunning portrait: #PAOTY

How is the WI's membership criteria eradicating trans people from public spaces? The WI is an organisation members pay to join, not a public space. Many clubs are mixed sex. The WI could change its name & membership criteria if its that bothered

Imo, using your example, if a trans man was, irl, excluded from both m/f facilities they needed, their employer would lawfully have to provide facilities they could use eg unisex single occupancy toilets.
Idk anyone who would disagree, 'GC people' or not

Don't be silly. The 'it' in "where does it say..." clearly relates to a piece of writing, not a person, which in english does not have a m/f pronoun🙄

Where does it say a person with GC beliefs thinks they're superior to anyone else?

It isn't stopping people who wear glasses from driving. It's an eye test to hopefully identify other more serious visual impairment which could affect an individual's ability to drive safely. I don't see a problem tbh. I'd also personally add a cognitive assessment & stop all drivers at 80!

Personally I think a test over a certain age would be far safer - there are drivers lacking insight into their declining health &/or cognition, who may not visit or listen to their dr

Some sports are categorised by age,sex,weight,disability to ensure safety & fairness - it's as simple as that.