I feel like a statement like this should be accompanied by even one citation. Maybe it's true, I don't know! But if the newspaper wants to not look like it's passing off conservative dogma as just accepted truth, maybe substantiate it?

I mean, it's kinda both?

Remember all the breathless videos of empty supermarket shelves during the Biden administration that turned out to be just seasonal changeover? This was taken this morning at my local Shaw's. I'm sure the transgender military ban will have eggs flying onto the shelves any day now.

All the way off

Just to be as pedantic as possible.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Youppi!

Like what the fuck does this even mean

I dunno, I'm being told she's very uncomfortable, as evidence by the "interesting" (what others might describe as extremely common) choice to include her running mate

The NYT editorial board is just three Bret Stephenses in a trenchcoat

The French Left rallies to defeat Le Pen days after Labour pulverizes the Tories.

hotdogsuit.jpg

Yesterday's Punchbowl newsletter. Editorializing presented as news.

Can't think of a better illustration of the viability of No Labels as a "popular" movement.

www.politico.com/news/2024/03...