hforsten
@hforsten.com
340 followers 51 following 72 posts
Electrical engineer. RF electronics, IC design, radars, FPGA, programming. hforsten.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
hforsten.com
SAR image is processed offline. It's just a hobby project.
hforsten.com
Synthetic aperture radar vs Gopro.
hforsten.com
Wrote code for SAR image antenna pattern normalization and polarimetric calibration (channel imbalance and crosstalk). Image looks very nice now.
Uncalibrated SAR image Same image after antenna pattern normalization and polarimetric calibration.
hforsten.com
It's 10 seconds of data (10,000 radar pulses) and it takes about a minute to process.
hforsten.com
I implemented a new SAR autofocus algorithm and now the image generation is both better and faster. It's about as well focused as it can be now.
Polarimetric synthetic aperture radar image Camera photo of the same area.
hforsten.com
Fixed some bugs in my SAR processing code and now fast factorized backprojection generates a visually identical picture to the normal backprojection, but over 10 times faster. That's huge because normal backprojection was already extremely quick and there's still room for optimization with FFBP.
hforsten.com
I also implemented generalized phase gradient autofocus earlier this week. I haven't seen any open source implementations of it before. It works quite well with this kind of short range SAR image, but my earlier minimum entropy optimization method still gives better results.
hforsten.com
Found motivation to write some SAR processing code. Fast factorized backprojection generates several small polar format images and then interpolates them to one big image. It's faster, but has slightly worse image quality due to all the interpolations.
Global backprojection vs fast factorized backprojection image quality. The biggest difference is larger sidelobes on the brightest target in the FFBP image.
hforsten.com
Just some random ones I had lying around. The bigger one is labeled: "XRRH6*10*3"
hforsten.com
That's the measured S21 from input to the isolated port when the other ports are terminated. Reflection of the termination is not de-embedded, but it's better than -25 dB over the whole frequency range.
hforsten.com
I made this new dual directional bridge coupler using 1 mm diameter coaxial cable. It's a little bit better than the previous one I made using 2 mm coaxial cable and much more annoying to solder.
Dual directional bridge coupler PCB. Thru, coupled, and isolated port S21 with other ports terminated.
hforsten.com
It works really well. Loss is low and matching is excellent.
hforsten.com
Bought this thru with 3.5mm RF connectors. It's air filled with just a thin see-thru membrane holding the center pin in place.
hforsten.com
Some new RF connector test PCBs. Nameless low-cost solderless 3.5 mm connector on the left and CONSMA003.062 clone on the right. Both work okay.
Two test PCBs with 3.5 mm and SMA connectors 3.5 mm connector close up 3.5 mm and SMA connector S-parameters with 11 mm line 3.5 mm and SMA connector time domain response with 11 mm long line
hforsten.com
It would require hole and threads in the case for the connector making the case more expensive. Connector would also need to be soldered to the PCB while attached to the case, not very handy for a prototype.
hforsten.com
It's this one: www.aliexpress.com/item/1005006.... Calibration coefficients are not included.
www.aliexpress.com
hforsten.com
Bought this VNA calibration kit with 3.5 mm connectors. Looks good considering the 60€ price tag.
hforsten.com
It's a very nice looking chip, but too expensive. Sure if someone else pays.
hforsten.com
Just found an annoying flaw with this cheap bias-T. The connector is threaded in the case and if the cable is tightened with a torque wrench, it can unscrew also the SMA connector when removing the cable.
hforsten.com
I bought this cheap Bias-T from China. It claims to function from 10 MHz to 10 GHz. Looks very nice from both outside and inside. Enclosure is machined from aluminium and PCB is not FR4. Measured with VNA it seems to work fine up to 6 GHz, but there's a small 1 dB dip in S21 around 1.1 GHz.
Bias-T outside Bias-T inside Two inductors in series Measured S-parameters
hforsten.com
That could work in some situations, but I don't think it will work here. The connection between SMA connector and the case is not tightened so it wouldn't be compressed. Mating surface also isn't a full circle, just the upper part of the connector.
hforsten.com
I thought this might be an issue during design. The proper fix would be to use a bulkhead SMA connector but that complicates the mechanical design and I didn't think it was worth the trouble.
hforsten.com
There's a tiny gap between the case and SMA connector that radiates a little if not sealed. Putting some solder wick in the gap seals it nicely but there has to be some more elegant method.