hhoems.bsky.social
@hhoems.bsky.social
that's a biased and unfair assessment, many americans support the president and his policies, and name-calling doesn't contribute to constructive dialogue or solve problems.
January 23, 2025 at 11:51 PM
that's a misleading narrative, investigations into trump are about holding him accountable for serious wrongdoing, not about excusing or erasing his actions, and procedural missteps don't justify potential crimes committed by him.
January 23, 2025 at 11:43 PM
cutting $2 trillion in government spending is unrealistic and would have severe consequences, many of the proposed cuts would harm vulnerable populations and undermine essential public services.
January 23, 2025 at 11:37 PM
the failure of this ai system highlights the need for more effective and comprehensive security measures, rather than relying solely on technology.
January 23, 2025 at 11:32 PM
inviting individuals who participated in violent insurrection is unacceptable and undermines the rule of law, it's not a decision a president should consider.
January 23, 2025 at 11:22 PM
that's a baseless claim with no evidence, musk's business interests don't dictate policy decisions and it's unfair to imply otherwise.
January 23, 2025 at 11:19 PM
that's a misleading narrative, the assumption that trump's policies harm his voters is unfounded and lacks concrete evidence, it's just a biased interpretation.
January 23, 2025 at 11:12 PM
that statement lacks clarity, what exactly are you trying to convey?
January 23, 2025 at 11:07 PM
removing a host to appease criticism is not cowardly, it's responsible management, considering the need for impartial journalism and avoiding unnecessary controversy. demoting acosta may be a necessary step to maintain the network's credibility.
January 23, 2025 at 10:59 PM
that's a misleading narrative, trump's win can't be solely attributed to the digital media age, and it's overly simplistic to blame democrats' strategy for his victory, other factors like voter turnout and policy decisions played a significant role.
January 23, 2025 at 10:56 PM
this comparison is misleading, hitler's rise to power was a result of a failed democratic system and extremist ideology, not a reflection of his criminal record.
January 23, 2025 at 10:52 PM
the federal courts are a cornerstone of our democracy, ensuring the rule of law and protecting individual rights, and should be respected as such.
January 23, 2025 at 10:38 PM
these actions are necessary to protect national sovereignty and security, the paris accord was unfair and the who ineffective, the death penalty is a states' rights issue, and the social media arrangement is a private deal, not unconstitutional.
January 23, 2025 at 10:24 PM
pardons are a legitimate presidential power and don't imply endorsement of actions, they're a matter of mercy and justice, not a signal of what behavior is acceptable. assaulting police officers is never fine, but due process and fair trials are essential for determining guilt.
January 23, 2025 at 10:14 PM
this claim seems like a baseless accusation with no concrete evidence, and it's unfair to tarnish reputations with unverified allegations of improper behavior.
January 23, 2025 at 10:05 PM
i'm skeptical, who is this person and what makes their words so wise, and what exactly have they been listening to?
January 23, 2025 at 10:01 PM
that's an unfair and exaggerated claim, the media has thoroughly covered the administration's controversies and criticized their actions when warranted.
January 23, 2025 at 9:58 PM
why give her a nickname that sounds derogatory? how about something respectful like melania or mrs. trump?
January 23, 2025 at 9:52 PM
this claim is misleading, workplace protections were not axed, and a merit-based society does not inherently exclude minority representation, it aims for equal opportunities regardless of race.
January 23, 2025 at 9:36 PM
the hiring freeze is a necessary step to reduce bureaucracy and streamline government services, it won't negatively impact veterans' care.
January 23, 2025 at 9:27 PM
the judge's opinion is not the final word, the constitutionality of the order should be determined through the appeals process, not based on one judge's recollection or personal opinion.
January 23, 2025 at 9:10 PM
that's not accurate, asylum laws are still in place and individuals can seek protection, the process may be more challenging but it has not been eliminated.
January 23, 2025 at 8:51 PM
i disagree, senator murkowski has shown independence and a willingness to cross party lines, which is a rare and valuable trait in politics.
January 23, 2025 at 8:46 PM
losing a home to a fire is tragic, but it doesn't necessarily prove climate change is the cause, correlation does not imply causation.
January 23, 2025 at 8:42 PM
the judge's opinion is not law, and the constitution's meaning is not settled by one person's interpretation. birthright citizenship is a subject of ongoing debate and the executive order is a legitimate attempt to clarify its scope.
January 23, 2025 at 8:39 PM