Hiyer Gilbran
@hiyer.bsky.social
Just a blue dot in the Greater Sonoran Desert.
In the land of the blind, the man with one eye is king. That’s true. But that doesn’t change the fact that it’s still the land of the blind and everything is still one big mess. King just gets to see it.
In the land of the blind, the man with one eye is king. That’s true. But that doesn’t change the fact that it’s still the land of the blind and everything is still one big mess. King just gets to see it.
You’re right on the immunity decision btw. They opined in the Colorado case that the 14th Amendment, Section 3 of the Constitution didn’t apply to the office of the President and then had to make their immunity ruling in August of 2024 to ensure Trump’s installation as President.
December 3, 2025 at 2:02 PM
You’re right on the immunity decision btw. They opined in the Colorado case that the 14th Amendment, Section 3 of the Constitution didn’t apply to the office of the President and then had to make their immunity ruling in August of 2024 to ensure Trump’s installation as President.
Clarence Thomas probably would have been the final vote to hand the 2020 election to Trump. Just like he did in the 2000 election with Bush. 3/3
December 3, 2025 at 1:56 PM
Clarence Thomas probably would have been the final vote to hand the 2020 election to Trump. Just like he did in the 2000 election with Bush. 3/3
They would have decided the Presidency in Trump’s favor. Just replace the fake elector slates with hanging chads for the controversy, Roger Stone’s Brooks Brothers Riot with J6 and it all would have gone to SCOTUS. 2/3
December 3, 2025 at 1:56 PM
They would have decided the Presidency in Trump’s favor. Just replace the fake elector slates with hanging chads for the controversy, Roger Stone’s Brooks Brothers Riot with J6 and it all would have gone to SCOTUS. 2/3
Pieces were already in place then to keep that from happening. SCOTUS was prepared to do the exact same thing it did in the 2000 election if those fake slates of electors had come into play. 1/3
December 3, 2025 at 1:56 PM
Pieces were already in place then to keep that from happening. SCOTUS was prepared to do the exact same thing it did in the 2000 election if those fake slates of electors had come into play. 1/3
Because it will help your skin, the largest organ of your body, age gracefully over time. You kids never look at the future and realize that the increased DOT to environmental exposure is cumulative, lasts forever and really is not a good look.
December 3, 2025 at 1:41 PM
Because it will help your skin, the largest organ of your body, age gracefully over time. You kids never look at the future and realize that the increased DOT to environmental exposure is cumulative, lasts forever and really is not a good look.
December 3, 2025 at 1:33 PM
Because it’s not a crisis. He does less damage and causes less chaos when he’s asleep. Why do you think no one in their right mind would nudge him awake?
December 3, 2025 at 6:04 AM
Because it’s not a crisis. He does less damage and causes less chaos when he’s asleep. Why do you think no one in their right mind would nudge him awake?
We don’t go after our own for international war crimes. The international community, that we were once members of, bring those charges. The cases are brought before The Hague and guys like Jack Smith do the prosecuting of them. It’s really out of our hands what the international community does.
December 3, 2025 at 5:55 AM
We don’t go after our own for international war crimes. The international community, that we were once members of, bring those charges. The cases are brought before The Hague and guys like Jack Smith do the prosecuting of them. It’s really out of our hands what the international community does.
What makes you think that SCOTUS wouldn’t have given Trump immunity in August of 2024 if Garland had prosecuted him instead of Jack Smith. All Garland would have accomplished doing that would have resulted in SCOTUS granting him immunity 6 months earlier than they did. That’s it.
December 3, 2025 at 5:49 AM
What makes you think that SCOTUS wouldn’t have given Trump immunity in August of 2024 if Garland had prosecuted him instead of Jack Smith. All Garland would have accomplished doing that would have resulted in SCOTUS granting him immunity 6 months earlier than they did. That’s it.
The more people working the more FICA withholdings available to pay SSI benefits. When no one is working there are no FICA withholdings to pay SSI benefits no matter if they were budgeted for or not by Congress. 2/2
December 3, 2025 at 5:18 AM
The more people working the more FICA withholdings available to pay SSI benefits. When no one is working there are no FICA withholdings to pay SSI benefits no matter if they were budgeted for or not by Congress. 2/2
That’s going to happen anyways. Their economies, when vibrant, generate a lot of Federal taxes. Not vibrant means less overall Federal taxes collected to be paid. SSI benefits are funded by the FICA withholdings out of peoples paychecks.
December 3, 2025 at 5:18 AM
That’s going to happen anyways. Their economies, when vibrant, generate a lot of Federal taxes. Not vibrant means less overall Federal taxes collected to be paid. SSI benefits are funded by the FICA withholdings out of peoples paychecks.
They’re going to have a difficult enough time anyways just surviving this winter. Blue States have more resources available to them. 2/2
December 3, 2025 at 4:58 AM
They’re going to have a difficult enough time anyways just surviving this winter. Blue States have more resources available to them. 2/2
That’s not entirely accurate. The Federal government will no longer fund the management portion of the Blue State’s SNAP programs. I’m sure that the Blue States can fund that entirely on their own and will. The Red States though will have a difficult time running their programs. 1/2
December 3, 2025 at 4:58 AM
That’s not entirely accurate. The Federal government will no longer fund the management portion of the Blue State’s SNAP programs. I’m sure that the Blue States can fund that entirely on their own and will. The Red States though will have a difficult time running their programs. 1/2
So as things get worse there is going to be less and less paid to the Feds. Kinda like the no taxes on overtime thing. No work, no overtime, no Federal taxes on overtime, no income also means no Federal income tax and no FICA or SSI withholdings.
December 3, 2025 at 4:39 AM
So as things get worse there is going to be less and less paid to the Feds. Kinda like the no taxes on overtime thing. No work, no overtime, no Federal taxes on overtime, no income also means no Federal income tax and no FICA or SSI withholdings.
And the people with their Federal income taxes. Employer withholdings for FICA, basically looking at California the entire economy figures into it and California pays a bit over 83 billion more than it receives from the Feds. But that figure is from previous years too. 1/2
December 3, 2025 at 4:39 AM
And the people with their Federal income taxes. Employer withholdings for FICA, basically looking at California the entire economy figures into it and California pays a bit over 83 billion more than it receives from the Feds. But that figure is from previous years too. 1/2
So you believe what a known liar and self proclaimed conman says? Why? I mean you can think for yourself right?
December 2, 2025 at 11:19 PM
So you believe what a known liar and self proclaimed conman says? Why? I mean you can think for yourself right?
Why blanket tariffs on the whole world sends the message that we want to trade nothing with you and is considered suicide for the imposing nations economy? That’s us btw. 5/5
December 2, 2025 at 11:13 PM
Why blanket tariffs on the whole world sends the message that we want to trade nothing with you and is considered suicide for the imposing nations economy? That’s us btw. 5/5
He wasn’t technically a student there yet so those records are not subject to privacy laws. Do you know the history of the tariff and why it’s used sparingly? 4/5
December 2, 2025 at 11:13 PM
He wasn’t technically a student there yet so those records are not subject to privacy laws. Do you know the history of the tariff and why it’s used sparingly? 4/5
We got nothing to offer anyone. Everyone’s broke and honestly no one wants anything to do with us. No one trusts us anymore and they most likely never will again. And yup, that’s because of Trump as well. The guys got an IQ of 74 according to Wharton acceptance exams. 3/5
December 2, 2025 at 11:13 PM
We got nothing to offer anyone. Everyone’s broke and honestly no one wants anything to do with us. No one trusts us anymore and they most likely never will again. And yup, that’s because of Trump as well. The guys got an IQ of 74 according to Wharton acceptance exams. 3/5
and there is such thing as a tax on other countries that you want to trade with. Maybe if there was an existing vibrant consumer base to offer to other countries but, ‘looks around’, umm that no longer exists here thanks to Trump and his illegal tariffs. 2/5
December 2, 2025 at 11:13 PM
and there is such thing as a tax on other countries that you want to trade with. Maybe if there was an existing vibrant consumer base to offer to other countries but, ‘looks around’, umm that no longer exists here thanks to Trump and his illegal tariffs. 2/5
Did you just make that up? You can’t just parrot nonsensical Republican talking points here, you’re going to get called out. Or are you intentionally trolling? If so your trolling needs a bit of work. Might want to trust me on that one. 1/5
December 2, 2025 at 11:13 PM
Did you just make that up? You can’t just parrot nonsensical Republican talking points here, you’re going to get called out. Or are you intentionally trolling? If so your trolling needs a bit of work. Might want to trust me on that one. 1/5
Every time he Tweets anything you see that 73 IQ on full display.
December 2, 2025 at 1:04 PM
Every time he Tweets anything you see that 73 IQ on full display.