Hannah Walser
@hkpmw.bsky.social
5.3K followers 2.9K following 2.9K posts
Thinking about people thinking about other people. First Amendment, interpretive methodologies, criminal law, law & philosophy. PhD (English) —> JD —> Furman Fellowship at NYU Law. Philly homer; mayor of the quiet car. she/her. hwalser.wordpress.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
hkpmw.bsky.social
“Interpretive Facts: Textualism, Empiricism, and the Law-Fact Divide” is now available on SSRN! The article will be published next spring/summer, so I have lots of time to incorporate suggestions. 😊

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Reposted by Hannah Walser
carlzimmer.com
Today my @nytimes.com colleagues and I are launching a new series called Lost Science. We interview US scientists who can no longer discover something new about our world, thanks to this year‘s cuts. Here is my first interview with a scientist who studied bees and fires. Gift link: nyti.ms/3IWXbiE
nyti.ms
hkpmw.bsky.social
Also. The commercials during this PLAYOFF BASEBALL game are crazy. “Monkey Magnets,” plus about 5000 morally troubling TLC shows
hkpmw.bsky.social
WHAT is the DEAL with all this BUNTing
hkpmw.bsky.social
🩵❤️❤️❤️❤️🩵
jacobsoboroff.bsky.social
Michigan Avenue right now.
hkpmw.bsky.social
(When you look at the Court’s jurisprudence in this area as a whole, it gets even more suspect. States can second-guess a minor’s “goal” when that goal is to address gender dysphoria by transitioning. Why do they have to accept a “goal” to address gender dysphoria through “conversion therapy”?) 8/8
hkpmw.bsky.social
To be clear, I think this is an exceptionally hard problem to solve through legislation/regulation! My point is simply that the “consent” framework is a red herring. 7/8
hkpmw.bsky.social
Sometimes they even sincerely believe that those things are morally right. For Chiles, much seems to hinge on the voluntary/consensual nature of the therapy she provides; she helps clients reach their “goals.” But that doesn’t help us when disordered goals themselves are part of the problem. 6/8
hkpmw.bsky.social
The reason has nothing to do with the directness of the physical harm and everything to do with the fact that medical/psych professionals should not uncritically accept certain every “goal” that their patients set. Sometimes patients—especially minors—sincerely want things that are bad for them. 5/8
hkpmw.bsky.social
Would it be ok for a therapist to go along with this wish—to “help” the patient overcome her dependence on food by talking through the root causes of her “overeating,” encouraging her to cultivate an attitude of emotional detachment toward food, whatever? It doesn’t seem ok to me. 4/8
hkpmw.bsky.social
Say a severely underweight teen with symptoms of anorexia comes to a therapist and says she has a problem with overeating. She wants to learn how to overcome her food cravings through talk therapy—cognitive reframing, etc. 3/8
hkpmw.bsky.social
Petitioner says no, but distinguishes: in that case, a practitioner would be telling a patient to do something that “directly harms their body,” which is different from talk therapy that aims to curb “unwanted” same-sex attraction etc. But one can easily imagine a much closer analogy: 2/8
hkpmw.bsky.social
Listening to yesterday’s oral argument in Chiles v. Salazar; very interested in J. Sotomayor’s hypothetical about anorexic patients. She asks: if a state wants to ban therapists from telling anorexic minors to engage in more restrictive eating, do they need a study to prove that it’s harmful? 1/8
Reposted by Hannah Walser
davemazella.bsky.social
Jim Crow is one obvious source for this, since one definition of racism is “lies you can tell about people without social cost.”
hkpmw.bsky.social
As someone who has been thinking a lot about what “belief” means in a legal context and how/why law cares about belief, I find this framing very interesting
fintwitter.bsky.social
US House Speaker Johnson: Some legal analysts don't believe in shutdown backpay.
hkpmw.bsky.social
My beautiful Nicky babyyyy!
hkpmw.bsky.social
THAT’S WHAT I LIKE TO SEE
hkpmw.bsky.social
Listen, I’ve given up hope on us winning but can we at least light up this bigot please
hkpmw.bsky.social
Listen, I’ve given up hope on us winning but can we at least light up this bigot please
hkpmw.bsky.social
(The answer to “Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind?” is plausibly “yes”; the answer re Trump still leans no)
hkpmw.bsky.social
This is of course utterly divorced from reality—but in my ongoing ”does Trump have a theory of mind” investigation, his speculation about state politicians’ motives is a fascinating data point
acyn.bsky.social
Trump: Portland is burning to the ground—insurrectionists all over the place. The politicians are afraid for their lives. That’s the only reason they say there’s nothing happening.
hkpmw.bsky.social
When Bryce Harper is frustrated he looks like he’s about to go pillage a small Scandinavian town
hkpmw.bsky.social
This is a fact
tcarmody.bsky.social
Look if Philadelphians don’t boo a great opposing player it just means they have completely lost all respect for him. It’s a courtesy
coachfinstock.bsky.social
Philly booing Ohtani cmon man. He's not a Dodger he's our national baseball Folk Hero. He is for everyone. He loves dogs and hits balls 500 ft and throws the ball 100 mph.
hkpmw.bsky.social
I was out walking my dogs and futzing around on my phone when a bird pooped right on the screen. I will not be learning any lessons from this
hkpmw.bsky.social
It’s a little embarrassing how much what’s going on in my sinuses affects my brain
hkpmw.bsky.social
My body seems to be rebelling against [gestures widely]