hola baby
holababy.bsky.social
hola baby
@holababy.bsky.social
NYC or death
Ode to the Trump admin
December 5, 2025 at 9:11 PM
They should be prosecuted for murder
December 5, 2025 at 5:33 PM
We all have to take off our shoes because of that ONE guy… 🙄
December 4, 2025 at 8:57 PM
That’s the ultimate dream, to create a beautiful young woman you have full control over. It’s the Pygmalion fantasy come to life
December 4, 2025 at 3:04 AM
How was he able to vote if he’s not a citizen? Where are the checks and balances? Is MAGA right that “illegals” are voting in droves?? Someone needs to explain this
December 4, 2025 at 12:36 AM
I thought for sure that if anyone could achieve world peace it would be a couple of hack real estate agents
December 3, 2025 at 4:51 PM
I recently read that no one is seeing footage of what’s happening in Gaza right now in their feeds bc the various platforms are all scrubbing it. We’re gonna have to go super old school and use Morse code like they did in Independence Day. Snail mail and carrier pigeons maybe 😫
December 3, 2025 at 4:48 PM
Jack&Jill Full Bath #2 with 3 sinks. The second and third sinks substitute for toilet and tub 👍
December 2, 2025 at 3:20 AM
Ive worked with some morons though who I wouldnt want controlling anything 🤣
December 1, 2025 at 10:59 PM
Ok well I’m just reacting to a few podcast episodes I saw. I haven’t independently examined the data 🤷🏻‍♀️
December 1, 2025 at 10:56 PM
Again, those arent the graphs I saw. I’ll have to rewatch the videos and show you the graphs I’m referencing. They had distinctive upticks at the very end on every graph I saw
December 1, 2025 at 10:54 PM
Obviously of course they would be different. Dems tend to vote by mail more. I’m saying that distribution patterns were normal for mail-in ballots but showed a Russian tail for electronic ballots again and again, at least in the graphs I saw. I’d have to rewatch to podcasts to get details tho
December 1, 2025 at 10:49 PM
He said their sources are all publicly available election results
December 1, 2025 at 10:11 PM
I find it compelling that mail-in patterns are vart from electronic-ballot patterns, and I guess I dont feel like these people are intentionally lying. They showed graphs of AZ, MI, NV, etc. It was on Christopher Titus’s podcast, over several episodes. No I didn’t interrogate their source data
December 1, 2025 at 10:10 PM
but electronic ballot results displayed “Russian tail” patterns again and again across states. Would make sense if someone tweaked an algorithm or something (“No one knows those voting machines better than Elon”), and Trump rails against mail-in ballots. Sorry, I dont have the graphs in front of me
December 1, 2025 at 10:06 PM
Ok, that thread has a lot of info. What I saw were bar graphs comparing mail-in ballot counts with electronic-ballot results for many counties, not just Cambria and Allegheny, and states other than just PA. The graphs showed that mail-in votes demonstrated historically normal patterns
December 1, 2025 at 10:06 PM
That estimate must have been based on something substantial. He’s not just some random dude, this is his job. He wouldnt irresponsibly just blurt out a number like 65K unless he had substantial backing for it. Again, I’m not sure where these numbers came from but it makes me curious
December 1, 2025 at 9:54 PM
I just don’t think they’re lying. They’re preparing a major lawsuit while being careful not to get sued themselves. This is all publicly available info
December 1, 2025 at 8:52 PM
I’ve seen many graphs of precinct results that display the “Russian tail” pattern first identified during Putin’s fake elections. The ETA statistician presented multiple graphs after that all displayed a Russian-tail formation, across many precincts in key swing states. Presented during a podcast
December 1, 2025 at 8:52 PM
Watch the video short, which is about the fact that 65K ballots should have been manually fed after the fact but ultimately only about 55K ballots were manually fed. The whole point of the video is where did the 9K+ ballots go? My question is where those actual numbers came from (65K, 55K)
December 1, 2025 at 8:46 PM
Regardless, the considerable amount of statistical analysis done by this group of voting districts across swing states has been very compelling, showing consistent patterns impossible to achieve through chance alone
December 1, 2025 at 3:30 PM
The Politifact article doesn’t actually address this specific claim. It was written at a time before so ballots had been counted. It simply says that measures were being taken to ensure app ballots would be counted. Would be interesting to know where the final numbers can’t from, the 65K vs 55K
December 1, 2025 at 3:30 PM