Pol du Mont
humanliberty.bsky.social
Pol du Mont
@humanliberty.bsky.social
Note that Greenland is already de facto part of the US military network. So the US strengthening its position there to protect its interests is closer to the US strengthening its commitment to Taiwan.
January 18, 2026 at 2:20 AM
So a rather insulting comparison by the left. If anything, willingness to show a commitment to imperial projects may strengthen Chinese perception of US commitment to Taiwan, a strategic node in the US network and key element of the US Asia strategy.
January 18, 2026 at 2:15 AM
Or is it suggested here that Taiwan is Greenland, and the US Denmark? A better comparison perhaps, but Taiwan isn’t a territory and has 23 million people and an actual military.
January 18, 2026 at 2:09 AM
19th century migration didn’t deal with a welfare state, and people dispersed on the frontier. Migrants couldn’t quickly naturalize. Chinese were excluded completely. When migrant flows became too big, and long term cultural assimilation could no longer be assumed, strict controls were introduced.
January 17, 2026 at 11:44 PM
Slave owning America was a utopia for migrants. Or just the brief period before Ellis island. Went smoothly as well?
January 17, 2026 at 11:31 PM
Personal threats. Nice country there friend. Keep up the good work
January 17, 2026 at 11:29 PM
The utopia without papers, so they weren’t fascists, I suppose, did have a distinct voting population which ran the country an enforced the laws, particularly regarding naturalization, as they saw fit.
January 17, 2026 at 11:28 PM
Yes. Old America. Jefferson and co had some issues with random people already in America during the founding become US citizens. It’s true that non citizens weren’t thrown out of the country by ICE, but there were several wars, like with Mexico and the Spanish Empire, native Americans.
January 17, 2026 at 11:26 PM
That would be unacceptable. A quick search finds a few cases involving “assaulting, resisting, or impeding federal officers.”
January 17, 2026 at 11:18 PM
No. The old America without papers relied very heavily on immigration controls and the native born population was easily identified as such. The question of illegality was a minor issue before the 20th century. At some point Ellis Island was built
January 17, 2026 at 11:14 PM
Non-citizens can only get real id if they are legal. Seems most people carry drivers licenses in the US.
January 17, 2026 at 11:10 PM
Those random civilians had slaves at that time. At least they didn’t have to carry id. More broadly speaking, I believe the world you long for disappeared around 2001.
January 17, 2026 at 11:01 PM
If the father is wealthy, “dating” the daughter counts as well
January 17, 2026 at 11:00 PM
You can get a passport card for $30. Immigrants are aware of lengthy procedures.
January 17, 2026 at 10:56 PM
The US has a massive police apparatus and they consistently ask for ID
January 17, 2026 at 10:55 PM
Carry an ID, yes. Can you upload it to your iPhone yet?
January 17, 2026 at 10:50 PM
Incorrect. Try reading my post again.
January 17, 2026 at 10:43 PM
If voting solved economic scarcity, why isn’t every country rich
January 17, 2026 at 10:40 PM
If I lived in an area where these operations were taking place I’d carry my passport. And it’s an attitude that should change. “Can I see some id” is a rather common question in the US for anyone. Buying alcohol even.
January 17, 2026 at 10:36 PM
Smoking is healthy
January 17, 2026 at 10:29 PM