January 10, 2026 at 4:01 PM
January 10, 2026 at 3:46 PM
January 10, 2026 at 7:17 AM
January 10, 2026 at 1:52 AM
Baby Beluga is NOT who you want up in your sh*t.
January 9, 2026 at 6:48 PM
Baby Beluga is NOT who you want up in your sh*t.
Agreed.
What is fascinating is the goons' rapid rise of emotional investment. Usually the first to lose control has already lost the argument.
Stated DOJ policy and judicial precedent are where we'll find our guidance.
#BlueTexas2026
#TaylorRehmet
#Talarico
#Crockett
What is fascinating is the goons' rapid rise of emotional investment. Usually the first to lose control has already lost the argument.
Stated DOJ policy and judicial precedent are where we'll find our guidance.
#BlueTexas2026
#TaylorRehmet
#Talarico
#Crockett
January 9, 2026 at 6:42 PM
Agreed.
What is fascinating is the goons' rapid rise of emotional investment. Usually the first to lose control has already lost the argument.
Stated DOJ policy and judicial precedent are where we'll find our guidance.
#BlueTexas2026
#TaylorRehmet
#Talarico
#Crockett
What is fascinating is the goons' rapid rise of emotional investment. Usually the first to lose control has already lost the argument.
Stated DOJ policy and judicial precedent are where we'll find our guidance.
#BlueTexas2026
#TaylorRehmet
#Talarico
#Crockett
2nd Amendment commas are a lovely rabbit hole.
Vaguely written laws normally allow expanded interpretations of legal boundaries - usually favoring defendants.
Are the goons twisting their own stated guidance? Those knuckleheads didn't just pull 18 USC 111 out of thin air.
Vaguely written laws normally allow expanded interpretations of legal boundaries - usually favoring defendants.
Are the goons twisting their own stated guidance? Those knuckleheads didn't just pull 18 USC 111 out of thin air.
January 9, 2026 at 5:57 PM
2nd Amendment commas are a lovely rabbit hole.
Vaguely written laws normally allow expanded interpretations of legal boundaries - usually favoring defendants.
Are the goons twisting their own stated guidance? Those knuckleheads didn't just pull 18 USC 111 out of thin air.
Vaguely written laws normally allow expanded interpretations of legal boundaries - usually favoring defendants.
Are the goons twisting their own stated guidance? Those knuckleheads didn't just pull 18 USC 111 out of thin air.
Fuzzy language; no doubt.
The goons in the video are arguing violations of the code. Do precedential court records exist parsing the semantics of 'forcibly interferes' versus 'interferes'?
#BlueTexas2026
#TaylorRehmet4TX
The goons in the video are arguing violations of the code. Do precedential court records exist parsing the semantics of 'forcibly interferes' versus 'interferes'?
#BlueTexas2026
#TaylorRehmet4TX
January 9, 2026 at 5:30 PM
Fuzzy language; no doubt.
The goons in the video are arguing violations of the code. Do precedential court records exist parsing the semantics of 'forcibly interferes' versus 'interferes'?
#BlueTexas2026
#TaylorRehmet4TX
The goons in the video are arguing violations of the code. Do precedential court records exist parsing the semantics of 'forcibly interferes' versus 'interferes'?
#BlueTexas2026
#TaylorRehmet4TX
Good point. Certainly the definition of "forcibly" has already been argued in court.
I read the below as individual prosecutable actions, with only one containing the word "forcibly".
"(1) forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates, or interferes..."
#TaylorRehmet4TX
#BlueTexas26
I read the below as individual prosecutable actions, with only one containing the word "forcibly".
"(1) forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates, or interferes..."
#TaylorRehmet4TX
#BlueTexas26
January 9, 2026 at 5:11 PM
Good point. Certainly the definition of "forcibly" has already been argued in court.
I read the below as individual prosecutable actions, with only one containing the word "forcibly".
"(1) forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates, or interferes..."
#TaylorRehmet4TX
#BlueTexas26
I read the below as individual prosecutable actions, with only one containing the word "forcibly".
"(1) forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates, or interferes..."
#TaylorRehmet4TX
#BlueTexas26
Reposted by Peregrino
The UK has mail-in voting. Voting fraud in the UK is estimated at 0.0008%.
France is unique amongst major countries as being the only one with no mail-in voting, otherwise Canada, Sweden, Germany etc all have mail-in voting.
Your president is lying to you.
France is unique amongst major countries as being the only one with no mail-in voting, otherwise Canada, Sweden, Germany etc all have mail-in voting.
Your president is lying to you.
January 9, 2026 at 4:07 PM
The UK has mail-in voting. Voting fraud in the UK is estimated at 0.0008%.
France is unique amongst major countries as being the only one with no mail-in voting, otherwise Canada, Sweden, Germany etc all have mail-in voting.
Your president is lying to you.
France is unique amongst major countries as being the only one with no mail-in voting, otherwise Canada, Sweden, Germany etc all have mail-in voting.
Your president is lying to you.