i_pi
@i-pi.bsky.social
Yeah, and the linked post specifically says “not AI”
January 17, 2026 at 4:05 PM
Yeah, and the linked post specifically says “not AI”
Sure, but the indictment accuses him of "authorizing" a leak, not "instructing" some to leak. There are many other issues with the indictment, but one could argue that "authorizing" broadly encompasses knowing about something beforehand and/or approving of it afterwards.
November 3, 2025 at 10:41 PM
Sure, but the indictment accuses him of "authorizing" a leak, not "instructing" some to leak. There are many other issues with the indictment, but one could argue that "authorizing" broadly encompasses knowing about something beforehand and/or approving of it afterwards.
That’s the point. If the Dodgers had won yesterday, they could potentially have wrapped up the Series in LA tonight. But with each team now needing two more wins, the Series is guaranteed to end in Toronto.
October 29, 2025 at 4:36 PM
That’s the point. If the Dodgers had won yesterday, they could potentially have wrapped up the Series in LA tonight. But with each team now needing two more wins, the Series is guaranteed to end in Toronto.
Good to see that certain methods of organizing beaver activity are still patentable
August 1, 2025 at 3:13 PM
Good to see that certain methods of organizing beaver activity are still patentable
A few questions: One, where's the fife. And two, gimme the fife.
June 27, 2025 at 8:48 PM
A few questions: One, where's the fife. And two, gimme the fife.
I agree that the judge’s prose is a bit flowery, but I have to agree that transforming texts into strings of tokens and doing a ton of linear algebra with those strings to produce a totally different text is about as transformative as I can imagine.
June 24, 2025 at 6:11 PM
I agree that the judge’s prose is a bit flowery, but I have to agree that transforming texts into strings of tokens and doing a ton of linear algebra with those strings to produce a totally different text is about as transformative as I can imagine.
I think you're also misrepresenting the judgment by focusing on the portion pertaining to the pirated works. Nobody is arguing that that's fair use. The judgment makes other conclusions, however--most notably, that training an LLM on (legally obtained) training copies is transformative fair use.
June 24, 2025 at 5:35 PM
I think you're also misrepresenting the judgment by focusing on the portion pertaining to the pirated works. Nobody is arguing that that's fair use. The judgment makes other conclusions, however--most notably, that training an LLM on (legally obtained) training copies is transformative fair use.
I agree. I read the ruling as saying:
1: For the purchased works (Anthropic spent millions doing so), training an LLM with them is inherently transformative and fair use.
2: For the pirated works, no fair use, and this separate issue will go to trial.
Hard to disagree with either point.
1: For the purchased works (Anthropic spent millions doing so), training an LLM with them is inherently transformative and fair use.
2: For the pirated works, no fair use, and this separate issue will go to trial.
Hard to disagree with either point.
June 24, 2025 at 5:05 PM
I agree. I read the ruling as saying:
1: For the purchased works (Anthropic spent millions doing so), training an LLM with them is inherently transformative and fair use.
2: For the pirated works, no fair use, and this separate issue will go to trial.
Hard to disagree with either point.
1: For the purchased works (Anthropic spent millions doing so), training an LLM with them is inherently transformative and fair use.
2: For the pirated works, no fair use, and this separate issue will go to trial.
Hard to disagree with either point.
Remember Alf? I will. Thanks for the soundtrack to my childhood.
May 31, 2025 at 6:38 AM
Remember Alf? I will. Thanks for the soundtrack to my childhood.
Good thing he did the "yeah, that's not going anywhere" tug at the end just to make sure
April 21, 2025 at 10:36 PM
Good thing he did the "yeah, that's not going anywhere" tug at the end just to make sure
Wasn't this a TNG episode? She even looks a bit like Leah Brahms
April 21, 2025 at 10:17 PM
Wasn't this a TNG episode? She even looks a bit like Leah Brahms
Sold? We're paying Bukele to take him. Now they have both the guy and our money--talk about a trade imbalance!
April 15, 2025 at 12:13 AM
Sold? We're paying Bukele to take him. Now they have both the guy and our money--talk about a trade imbalance!
Maybe just “No King Party”? Otherwise we’d be allowed to have *one*.
March 13, 2025 at 11:29 PM
Maybe just “No King Party”? Otherwise we’d be allowed to have *one*.
See also David Foster Wallace's essay "Authority and American Usage," which I found to be a fun exploration of descriptivism v. prescriptivism as guiding principles for dictionaries.
web.ics.purdue.edu
February 22, 2025 at 7:49 PM
See also David Foster Wallace's essay "Authority and American Usage," which I found to be a fun exploration of descriptivism v. prescriptivism as guiding principles for dictionaries.