Dr Ian J Stewart
@ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
2.1K followers 310 following 81 posts
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇬🇧ExecDir James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies DC @miis Past @DefenceHQ, @warstudies. Nonpro, emerging tech, China. Nuc engineer. Phd War Studies. http://nonproarchive.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
Here for nukes, osint, export controls, sanctions, and international security. Looking forward discussion and network building!
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
And indeed Grossi calls for this in the UNSC meeting
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
It's time for the IAEA to get access to the facilities. US and Israel should agree with Grossi to conduct no further attacks on nuclear facilities. Maybe this will be discussed at the upcoming Security Council meeting.
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
It's time for the IAEA to get access to the facilities. US and Israel should agree with Grossi to conduct no further attacks on nuclear facilities. Maybe this will be discussed at the upcoming Security Council meeting.
Reposted by Dr Ian J Stewart
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
I just wrote a quick piece that i'd encourage you to read and share: Eyes on the Clock - What Comes Next for Iran’s Nuclear Program
I focus on the HEU, the potential for Iran to withdraw from the NPT & prospects for UN snapback. We have till October.
www.nonproarchive.com/article/2025...
Eyes on the Clock: What Comes Next for Iran’s Nuclear Program
Dr Ian Stewart, 22 June 2025The attacks by Israel and the US on Iran's nuclear program have disabled and perhaps destroyed key facilities. While the next few days are likely to be consumed with analys...
www.nonproarchive.com
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
Snapback and Iranian threats re the NPT and safeguards are likely to be the two key elements of diplomatic leverage and negotiation in the months ahead.
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
Snapback was built into the JCPOA and embedded in UNSCR 2231. It allows JCPOA participants to reintroduce the previous UNSCRs on Iran in case of non-compliance. If Iran withdraws from NPT or hides the HEU, snapback should be triggered. But we only have until October.
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
I just wrote a quick piece that i'd encourage you to read and share: Eyes on the Clock - What Comes Next for Iran’s Nuclear Program
I focus on the HEU, the potential for Iran to withdraw from the NPT & prospects for UN snapback. We have till October.
www.nonproarchive.com/article/2025...
Eyes on the Clock: What Comes Next for Iran’s Nuclear Program
Dr Ian Stewart, 22 June 2025The attacks by Israel and the US on Iran's nuclear program have disabled and perhaps destroyed key facilities. While the next few days are likely to be consumed with analys...
www.nonproarchive.com
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
Images of fordow suggest hit with possibility of significant damage. To be clear, though, Iran had enough 60% HEU to produce 90% for 10 nuclear weapons in days at fordow. That enrichment could continue at small site in weeks. HEU must be dealt with.
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
My last job in UK government was watching Iran building these damned facilities, including fordow and trying to stop them getting equipment and material from around the world. End of a chapter. But it's not over. Need to deal with HEU. Then what comes next.
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
See the bulletin on this, but let me say it more concisely. radiation release is not an issue for Natanz or Fordow. They are not nuclear reactors.
francoisdm.bsky.social
🚨 What are the radiological risks of striking Fordow, Natanz, Isfahan—and other Iranian nuclear facilities.

I assessed the risks yesterday for @thebulletin.org

thebulletin.org/2025/06/the-...

#Fordow #Natanz #Isfahan #Esfahan #Iran #nuclearweapons #JCPOA #NPT
The radiation risks of Iran’s nuclear program, with or without a strike on Fordow
Israel’s attacks create significant risks at Iran's nuclear sites. What could go wrong?
thebulletin.org
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
I also deleted the diplomacy section. Alas.
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
I just did a quick update to the Live Situation Briefing: The Iran Nuclear Program page here nonproarchive.com/article/2025....
New headline assessment. We must track, verify and dispose of the 400+ kgs of 60% HEU.
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
And no, not job done. You must deal with the HEU!
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
The US has struck Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan. Eyes on the prize, folks, there are 400kgs of 60% HEU out of international verification. It must be accounted for and disposed of. www.nonproarchive.com/article/2025...
Eyes on the Prize: Iran’s Highly Enriched Uranium Is Out of Control
Dr Ian J Stewart, 14 June 2025
www.nonproarchive.com
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
Israel took out the power supplies to the site which the basis for the non-operational assessment. There is a question about damage to the centrifuges, but I think I saw earlier that Israel struck again. I'll add a site analysis to the live situation briefing page soon (maybe tomorrow though).
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
Here's the headline assessment (sorry text too long for 1 post)
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
I am now maintaining an article containing a live situation briefing on the status of Iran's nuclear program in the context of Israel's strikes. I'll update this to include more depth and new information as things transpire. I will also post updates on X & here www.nonproarchive.com/article/2025...
Live Situation Briefing: The Iran Nuclear Program
Dr Ian J Stewart, 21 June 2025
www.nonproarchive.com
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
And of course, yes, I understand that Iran may not agree to this. But since the HEU situation is untenable, I believe the US would act.
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
It seems Iran is barrier to such an agreement right now. While I get Iran's principled position, reality is Iran created an untenable situation with the HEU. It has 400kgs of 60% currently outside international verification - enough for 10 weapons. This must be addressed.
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
Beyond that, the nuclear priority is to get the HEU out the country, to agree limits on enrichment, and a resumption of JCPOA like verification measures. Other priorities relate to missiles. Presumably in exchange for linked sanctions relief. An agreement still possible.
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
The HEU issue must be addressed. Iran says it won't give up enrichment or negotiate in conflict. Possibility is interim 1 month agrmnt in which US does not strike while Iran provides IAEA access to nuclear sites and materials, HEU moved out of Fordow & no enrichment beyond 5%.
Reposted by Dr Ian J Stewart
ian-j-stewart.bsky.social
That's not what I mean or the point. There is 10 weapons worth of material that must be addressed. It can be done through diplomacy or military action. But it must be addressed. So far diplomacy is not solving it. It's not about that Israel did. It's about where we stand today.