Ian Waring
banner
ianwaring.bsky.social
Ian Waring
@ianwaring.bsky.social
Fabulous Data, Analytics and Business Manager. Gets things done with AI Tools. Tech Guru. Best Dad Jokes. Modest. Simplicity sells!
Would be good is the USA paid us for their presence rather than living off our backs
February 5, 2026 at 7:00 PM
From last years drops - summarised
January 31, 2026 at 7:09 PM
January 31, 2026 at 6:06 PM
The core weakness with all crypto tech is the ability to create unlimited anonymous entities at the network edge - by design. It’s offshore banking on steroids.
January 31, 2026 at 5:58 PM
Mandelson was hooked into Russian asset sell off proposals with JP Morgan via Epstein
January 31, 2026 at 5:48 PM
I’ve not got 360GB spare to process the files. So unless I can get a 1TB SSD for £170 or so, all my OCR and PDF extract code will sit this one out
January 31, 2026 at 3:31 PM
Fwiw my code also unredacts text where censors paint black boxes on top of PDFs. That outed over 4,000 if the 2022 Court and FOIA files. The Aug and Dec drops were redacted properly. Don’t know about the latest releases yet
January 31, 2026 at 12:19 AM
Putin's boy in the Oval Office is doing all his work gratis. Just wonder who's going to buy all his bonds when Europe - who have 8 trillion - decide they don't support funding the US deficit any longer
January 18, 2026 at 7:31 PM
So which label do you think they’re all being redacted under? They’re all being redacted under at least one of three cited as conditions to be hidden.
January 13, 2026 at 1:40 PM
Waste of time anyway when anyone claiming to be a “victim” (of Epstein or Maxwell), or who is “a member of the public”, or who someone unknown thinks may affect national security, is redacted before publication. Cart and horses making the whole exercise pointless.
January 13, 2026 at 12:49 PM
Waste of time anyway when anyone claiming to be a “victim” (of Epstein or Maxwell), or who is “a member of the public”, or who someone unknown thinks may affect national security, is redacted before publication. Cart and horses making the whole exercise pointless.
January 13, 2026 at 12:46 PM
In the trivial-to-unredact files officially released, there’s only one co-conspirator named without the word “alleged” preceding it. British male.
January 13, 2026 at 12:44 PM
Everyone claims to be a victim of Epstein and Maxwell.
January 13, 2026 at 12:37 PM
Waste of time anyway when anyone claiming to be a “victim” (of Epstein or Maxwell) or who is “a member of the public”, or who someone unknown thinks may affect national security, is redacted before publication. Cart and horses making the whole exercise pointless.
January 13, 2026 at 12:16 PM
Because it’s a waste of time when anyone claiming to be a “victim” (of Epstein or Maxwell) or who is “a member of the public”, or who someone unknown thinks may affect national security, is redacted before publication. Cart and horses making the whole exercise pointless.
January 13, 2026 at 12:14 PM
Which ones? Quite a few folks probably downloaded copies...
December 21, 2025 at 11:01 PM
The get-out is the classification. The court records are already redacted, do the only "reclassification" is to remove the names of those implicated. Looks like another whitewash.
December 19, 2025 at 10:21 PM