@ianwinwood.bsky.social
170 followers 170 following 110 posts
Bodies: Life & Death In Music published by Faber & Faber. Music and culture writer for the Telegraph and New European. Barnsley FC, New York Mets, New Jersey Devils. Lives in Camden Town, London.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
ianwinwood.bsky.social
It’s about an ex-footballer. I think it’s 110% right.
Reposted
iranzye.bsky.social
Today I celebrate 1 month since the release of my graphic novel, if u haven't read it yet, it's free now with an option to tip, so go read it or I'll eat you 🍽️ 😂😂.

47pages- fully illustrated.
Tittle: STELLAR
ianwinwood.bsky.social
Oh, he has plenty of those. (I like to think I’m at least sufferable.)

I’ve read it 11 times, would you believe?

As well as being wonderful in every way, it’s also (I think) a good “in” to his wider body of work.
ianwinwood.bsky.social
Have you read Vineland, Kate? If not, I can’t recommend it highly enough.

(I’m sure you know this but Pynchon’s book was a major inspiration on the film.)
ianwinwood.bsky.social
It’s why breakthrough bands don’t come from London any more.

No one has a garage, and rent at rehearsal spaces is a major obstacle.
ianwinwood.bsky.social
It was doing better than a book by an “unknown” author should have been doing, and promoted more heavily.

Then Rowling leaked the truth of the situation in full.
ianwinwood.bsky.social
No, I don’t believe that I did. But of course it’s legitimate for you to interpret it that way.

So, I’ve just spoken to someone in publishing who knows the story. Initially, the first book was doing well enough that it was suspected that someone at Waterstones had been told of its provenance…
ianwinwood.bsky.social
That would be stipulated in the contract.

I’m saying “poor” by the metric of the publisher and the author, not by me.
ianwinwood.bsky.social
I think for Harry Potter it would, increasingly, be larger by a distance of galaxies.

But a book published pseudonymously? Much, much less.

Unless there was a clause in the contract that her name could be leaked if sales were poor.
ianwinwood.bsky.social
Question asked in good faith (and politely): what is the alternative inference?

Profitability (or lack of) and literary worth are doing business in the same post.
ianwinwood.bsky.social
Now *that* is very good.

👏👏👏
ianwinwood.bsky.social
Maybe. But you’re not one of them.
ianwinwood.bsky.social
Once again. I am not defending JK Rowling. I am defending the idea that books (in general) don’t have to turn a profit before they can be said to have literary merit.
ianwinwood.bsky.social
But according to the logic of the original post, the Harry Potter series has immense literary value… because it made immense profits.
ianwinwood.bsky.social
The point that was made was that the book had no merit *because* it made a loss. That’s what I was disputing.
ianwinwood.bsky.social
I’m doing no such thing.

I’m disputing the logic that only books that turn a profit have literary merit.

I’m not your pal.
ianwinwood.bsky.social
There’s some nice capitalist takes you have there.
ianwinwood.bsky.social
Only a very small number of books recoup their advance. Ninety percent of titles sell fewer than 2000 copies.

Your post implies that only books that turn a profit have literary merit.

Respectfully, I disagree.
ianwinwood.bsky.social
At a wedding in New York, last week, I was introduced to Zohran Mamdani’s speechwriter. If you like people who constantly look past you to see if there’s anyone more important they could be chatting to, then he’s great.

But he’s a mad keen Derby County supporter. An expert. That I did not expect.