@iaredoc.bsky.social
Interventional Radiologist with a particular interest in complex systemic and portal venous disease.
It’s a lack of principles. He’s a grifter who saw an opportunity with antivaxers, but that doesn’t mean it was a deeply held belief. I’m glad he’s supporting the MMR, but I’m not going to hold my breath for future intelligent decisions.
March 3, 2025 at 2:29 AM
It’s a lack of principles. He’s a grifter who saw an opportunity with antivaxers, but that doesn’t mean it was a deeply held belief. I’m glad he’s supporting the MMR, but I’m not going to hold my breath for future intelligent decisions.
Is there a formal “return to work” program for retraining? I can only imagine the amount of have to learn to remain capable if I missed a year or two, much less 12.
October 12, 2024 at 2:31 PM
Is there a formal “return to work” program for retraining? I can only imagine the amount of have to learn to remain capable if I missed a year or two, much less 12.
Looks slightly nodular. Where’s the TIPS??
Jk looks great!
Jk looks great!
September 16, 2024 at 12:34 PM
Looks slightly nodular. Where’s the TIPS??
Jk looks great!
Jk looks great!
4 This is meant to be sensational, and it is sensational, but it’s noting more than sensational. 50% of the population who gets Covid is not getting “fibrosis of the lungs”
January 2, 2024 at 5:16 AM
4 This is meant to be sensational, and it is sensational, but it’s noting more than sensational. 50% of the population who gets Covid is not getting “fibrosis of the lungs”
2 it’s a poor selection of atudies, with results ranging from 9% to 88%.
3 it’s deeply affected by selection bias, with the only patients included those with ct scans. Most patients who get Covid don’t get CT’s, and would not be included
3 it’s deeply affected by selection bias, with the only patients included those with ct scans. Most patients who get Covid don’t get CT’s, and would not be included
January 2, 2024 at 5:14 AM
2 it’s a poor selection of atudies, with results ranging from 9% to 88%.
3 it’s deeply affected by selection bias, with the only patients included those with ct scans. Most patients who get Covid don’t get CT’s, and would not be included
3 it’s deeply affected by selection bias, with the only patients included those with ct scans. Most patients who get Covid don’t get CT’s, and would not be included
Read the study, and there are multiple issues with the way you are presenting it:
1 it’s classifying a patient as having pulmonary fibrosis if there is post inflammatory scarring on imaging. This is NOT IPF, the progressive and fatal disease.
1 it’s classifying a patient as having pulmonary fibrosis if there is post inflammatory scarring on imaging. This is NOT IPF, the progressive and fatal disease.
January 2, 2024 at 5:12 AM
Read the study, and there are multiple issues with the way you are presenting it:
1 it’s classifying a patient as having pulmonary fibrosis if there is post inflammatory scarring on imaging. This is NOT IPF, the progressive and fatal disease.
1 it’s classifying a patient as having pulmonary fibrosis if there is post inflammatory scarring on imaging. This is NOT IPF, the progressive and fatal disease.
45%? I’m going to need to see some receipts on a wild claim like that.
January 1, 2024 at 9:05 PM
45%? I’m going to need to see some receipts on a wild claim like that.