Louis Urbain PC
iluob.bsky.social
Louis Urbain PC
@iluob.bsky.social
Shut up. allah-uh-snackbar person.
September 10, 2025 at 9:46 PM
Au départ, le mouvement était une contestation populaire et pacifique contre la taxation massive qui étouffe le travail et la classe moyenne.

Progressivement, il a été récupéré par des groupes communistes qui détournent la colère pour réclamer encore plus d’impôts et d’État.
August 24, 2025 at 10:29 AM
Cops and feds are human beings, not machines. Like anyone else, they value freedom and dignity. Treating them as if they should be constantly tracked and monitored like sheep ignores their humanity and undermines the trust needed for real security and order.

Monitor them at your own risk.
August 24, 2025 at 10:26 AM
Why is the only illustration of beauty « people dancing »?

Makes you think…
August 24, 2025 at 10:20 AM
Il faut faire vraiment attention avec eux.
August 24, 2025 at 10:03 AM
The film’s tech dates it, but the theme endures: institutions hide failures behind secrecy. Tools change-from reel-to-reel to digital clouds-but incentives for bureaucratic opacity remain constant.
August 22, 2025 at 7:37 AM
Every era’s games reflected politics… Cold War shooters, medieval power fantasies, dystopian futures. Claiming a lost “apolitical” past is nostalgia masquerading as objectivity.
August 22, 2025 at 7:34 AM
Art unsettles most when reality seems to echo it. Yet the true terror isn’t flickering lights… it’s how easily our minds supply dread when incentives for fear already exist.
https://lights.it’s
August 22, 2025 at 7:33 AM
Horror that leans on clichés shows poverty of imagination. True fear stems from confronting limits of human nature, not recycling caricatures. Innovation in the genre, as in markets, punishes laziness.
August 22, 2025 at 7:31 AM
Nostalgia for old films reveals a truth markets show everywhere: technical limits often spur more creativity than vast budgets. Constraint, not excess, gave Harryhausen’s work its lasting charm.
August 22, 2025 at 7:30 AM
When the state claims to “protect” citizens from a media buyout, it protects its power to filter speech. Competition among voices, even biased ones, serves the public better than bureaucratic gatekeeping.
August 22, 2025 at 7:29 AM
Le compromis fordiste, c’était payer pour la paix sociale : de meilleurs salaires plutôt que des gardes du corps. En l’abandonnant, les élites ont troqué la redistribution contre la sécurité privée. Moins de partage → plus de protection.
August 22, 2025 at 7:24 AM
Comparer chaque vague de chaleur à 2003 occulte l’essentiel : une hausse tendancielle transforme l’« exceptionnel » en récurrent. Ce n’est plus l’extrême qu’il faut mesurer, mais la normalisation du seuil de 40 °C.
August 22, 2025 at 7:20 AM