1st class Hons history of ideas inc credit areas history & philosophy of science, mind body problem, science & religion Blog at https://ian-wardell.blogspot.com
Re Letby: B following A doesn't entail that A causes B!
Re Letby: B following A doesn't entail that A causes B!
If the only change were the absence of Letby that would indeed seem to be fairly strong suggestive evidence. However, it's my understanding that there were other changes.
If the only change were the absence of Letby that would indeed seem to be fairly strong suggestive evidence. However, it's my understanding that there were other changes.
And I wish people would try to understand what the word "conspiracy" means. Incompetence doesn't require any conspiracy.
And I wish people would try to understand what the word "conspiracy" means. Incompetence doesn't require any conspiracy.
You can't weigh up both sides since neither side are impartial or objective. Esp a jury!
You can't weigh up both sides since neither side are impartial or objective. Esp a jury!
The truth is more likely to be obtained if 1 weighs up both sides and is objective and impartial as they can possibly be. Vested interests in a particular conclusion absolutely cannot be trusted.
The truth is more likely to be obtained if 1 weighs up both sides and is objective and impartial as they can possibly be. Vested interests in a particular conclusion absolutely cannot be trusted.
Impartial & objective as it's possible to be? I somewhat doubt that!
No, I don't know these details. Remember, I'm not claiming she's innocent. It might be that some of the evidence is sufficiently compelling. Some "experts" claim it is, others disagree. I have no idea
Impartial & objective as it's possible to be? I somewhat doubt that!
No, I don't know these details. Remember, I'm not claiming she's innocent. It might be that some of the evidence is sufficiently compelling. Some "experts" claim it is, others disagree. I have no idea
So long as you don't find the notes or her demeanour as being evidential, then that's fine. I can't judge whether she's guilty or not as I simply lack the knowledge. I'm certainly not interested in watching a 1-sided 7-hour video. We need stuff to be impartial and objective
So long as you don't find the notes or her demeanour as being evidential, then that's fine. I can't judge whether she's guilty or not as I simply lack the knowledge. I'm certainly not interested in watching a 1-sided 7-hour video. We need stuff to be impartial and objective