Inequality and Distributive Politics - IDP
@inqdp.bsky.social
1.8K followers 980 following 170 posts
The IDP is a research group at ZfK & IfP, University of Marburg, Germany. In our website (https://inq-dp.eu/) you can find more about us, our research, & our outreach activities, including the "Maps of Inequality in Marburg"
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
inqdp.bsky.social
6/6 🧵In @thejop.bsky.social Scheve & @stasavage.bsky.social use time-series data for many countries, showing that democratization increases anti-trust legislation, but only in places with low inequality. doi.org/p76h
inqdp.bsky.social
5/6 🧵 In @polbehavior.bsky.social, @hanslueders.bsky.social ask, do exclusionary local policies change where immigrants want to live? Findings of 🇲🇽 immigrants in 🇺🇸 show they do but financial concerns often win and naturalized citizens respond due to discrimination and safety worries. doi.org/p76d
inqdp.bsky.social
4/6 🧵In @poppublicsphere.bsky.social, @edwardgoldring.bsky.social, Schmid & Apaydin find blame-shifting (esp. force majeure) by autocrat backfires. Survey experiment: Erdogan’s approval dropped (6-8%) among upper class after the 2023 earthquake in 🇹🇷. doi.org/g93527
inqdp.bsky.social
3/6 🧵In @thejop.bsky.social, Meisels compares different measures of congressional candidates’ responsiveness in primaries. Text data from 🇺🇸. Results show that campaign platform data suggests more responsiveness and greater incentives for extremism than campaign finance data. doi.org/p76n
inqdp.bsky.social
2/6 🧵In @politicalgeography.bsky.social, Willumsen examines preferences of MPs and voters for location of capitals in 🇩🇪, 🇦🇹 & 🇨🇭. All purely selfish, prefer close locations irrespective of national or state level capital. doi.org/p76k
inqdp.bsky.social
1/6 📰🧐 Research Digest September 2025 - Choosing capital cities in 🇩🇪, 🇦🇹 & 🇨🇭 - Primary responsiveness in 🇺🇸 - Populist blameshifting backfires in 🇹🇷 - Effects of local policies on internal migration - Inequality, democracy and anti-trust legislation
inqdp.bsky.social
6/6 🧵Shorrocks, Ralph-Morrow & de Geus in @bjpols.bsky.social study voter sexism and electoral penalties for women candidates. While they find no effect for voter sexism on support for women generally, they find that abstention is an electoral choice for sexist partisans in the USA. doi.org/p4qr
inqdp.bsky.social
5/6 🧵In APSR, @alexanderhorn.bsky.social @klueserthan.bsky.social & Haselmayer study party manifesto response to income inequality in 12 OECD countries. Left parties mention economic inequality issues more when inequality increases, but not in higher inequality settings https://doi.org/g9zm39
inqdp.bsky.social
4/6 🧵Using survey experiment, Magalhães et al (2025) in @ispp-pops.bsky.social show voters (in 🇵🇹) support weaker due process rights for corruption suspect from opposing party vs their own party. Out-group derogation prevails in-group favoritism in corruption evaluation. https://doi.org/p4qt
inqdp.bsky.social
3/6 🧵Goerres & @jeicheler.bsky.social in @electoralstudies.bsky.social, use a solidarity game to study whether party alliance or left-right self-assessment predicts solidarity in 🇩🇪 & 🇦🇹. They find that left-right selfplacement predicts solidaric behaviour but depends on context. doi.org/p4qq
inqdp.bsky.social
2/6 🧵In @apsrjournal.bsky.social @jacklucas.bsky.social et al. compare politicians’ & citizens’ theories of voting with surveys in 11 countries. Evaluate 8 theoretical debates, e.g. sociotropic vs. pocketbook. Many differences. Politicians think voters more short-sighted & egoistic doi.org/g8rckv
inqdp.bsky.social
1/6 📰🧐 Research Digest August 2025 - Politician beliefs about voters - Self-assessment and solidaric behaviour - Voters’ evaluation of politicians’ corruption - Inequality and party manifestoes in OECD - Voter sexism and women candidates
inqdp.bsky.social
6/6 🧵In @bjpols.bsky.social‬, @nmalhotra.bsky.social and colleagues study small business owners (sbo) and their voting behaviour. They find that sbo’s are more likely to vote for right-wing parties, because of their experience, leading to conservative views on gov. regulation. https://doi.org/pz69
inqdp.bsky.social
5/6 🧵In ‪@ajpseditor.bsky.social@luciamotoliniac.bsky.social Klašnja & @simonweschle.bsky.social‬ show that higher pressures to spend in campaigns leads to a wealthier politician pool. Use data on MP wealth from 40 countries, & quasiexperimental evidence from 🇧🇷 & 🇨🇱 https://doi.org/pz7c
inqdp.bsky.social
4/6 🧵In @electoralstudies.bsky.social Brännlund &‬ @rafaelahlskog.bsky.social investigate causal effect of wealth on participation. Use twins & wealth registers in 🇸🇪. Results from twin pair FE models do not show effect on voting & effect on civic participation closer to negative doi.org/pz68
inqdp.bsky.social
3/6 🧵 In @cpsjournal.bsky.social, @alanjacobs.bsky.social & @markkayser.bsky.social analyze social status & far-right voting via ESS in West Europe 2002-2020. Downward intergeneration occupational mobility brings far-right voting, but upward mobility doesn't protect. doi.org/10.1177/001041402513496
inqdp.bsky.social
2/6 🧵in World Development, ‪@mkjustesen.bsky.social‬ ‪@smidsina.bsky.social‬ & Koob examine attitudes toward clientelistic & programmatic appeals with conjoint in 🇧🇷. Voters prefer programmatic offers but also hierarchy of cliententelist appeals: jobs preferred over cash. https://doi.org/pz7b
inqdp.bsky.social
1/6 📰🧐 Research Digest July 2025 - Clientelistic and progrmmatic appeals in 🇧🇷 - Social status & far-right voting in Western Europe - Absence of causal effect of wealth on political participation in 🇸🇪 - High campaign costs and wealthy politicians - The politics of small business owners
inqdp.bsky.social
6/6 🧵In @bjpols.bsky.social‬, @nmalhotra.bsky.social and colleagues study small business owners (sbo) and their voting behaviour. They find that sbo’s are more likely to vote for right-wing parties, because of their experience, leading to conservative views on gov. regulation. https://doi.org/pz69
inqdp.bsky.social
5/6 🧵In ‪@ajpseditor.bsky.social@luciamotoliniac.bsky.social Klašnja & @simonweschle.bsky.social‬ show that higher pressures to spend in campaigns leads to a wealthier politician pool. Use data on MP wealth from 40 countries, & quasiexperimental evidence from 🇧🇷 & 🇨🇱 https://doi.org/pz7c
inqdp.bsky.social
4/6 🧵In @electoralstudies.bsky.social Brännlund &‬ @rafaelahlskog.bsky.social investigate causal effect of wealth on participation. Use twins & wealth registers in 🇸🇪. Results from twin pair FE models do not show no effect on voting & effect on civic participation closer to negative doi.org/pz68
inqdp.bsky.social
3/6 🧵 In @cpsjournal.bsky.social, @alanjacobs.bsky.social & @markkayser.bsky.social analyze social status & far-right voting via ESS in West Europe 2002-2020. Downward intergeneration occupational mobility brings far-right voting, but upward mobility doesn't protect. doi.org/10.1177/001041402513496
inqdp.bsky.social
2/6 🧵in World Development, ‪@mkjustesen.bsky.social‬ ‪@smidsina.bsky.social‬ & Koob examine attitudes toward clientelistic & programmatic appeals with conjoint in 🇧🇷. Voters prefer programmatic offers but also hierarchy of cliententelist appeals: jobs preferred over cash. https://doi.org/pz7b
inqdp.bsky.social
6/6 🧵In @polbehavior.bsky.social‬, @lukrudolph.bsky.social‬, ‪@phanxi.bsky.social‬ & Bernauer study effects on NIMBYism. Survey experiment in 🇨🇭. Results show NIMBY opposition occurs even when there are localized benefits & that it depends on ex ante perceptions of costs/benefits. doi.org/pvct
inqdp.bsky.social
5/6 🧵 In @polbehavior.bsky.social‬, @jvanslageren.bsky.social Rosmalen & Mennes study inequality in internal & external political efficacy from 12 to 15 years old in a panel survey in 🇳🇱. Find inequalities by social status and gender, but the differences decrease with age https://doi.org/pvcs