Pete Hart
@intensiveperson.bsky.social
100 followers 95 following 280 posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
intensiveperson.bsky.social
The things I do to reduce risk of regurg/vomiting are 1) Rev T'berg, 2) Avoiding proemetic stimuli (large opioid bolus, cricoid pressure!) before/during LOC, 3) No bagging unless they need it, and therefore PreO2 +/- ApOx, large dose of relaxant. IMO time/speed is overemphasised. (2/2)
intensiveperson.bsky.social
RSI is a failed construct. It no longer represents any consistent set of interventions and so is not a useful term to communicate meaning. So the answer to the question "Can you do an RSI with TIVA" depends entirely on what components of RSI you think are important. (1/2)
intensiveperson.bsky.social
Maybe patients having ECT are on CNS depressants already that reduce the incidence? Speculatively. I think 5-10% of my patients used to get it before I started using lidocaine.
intensiveperson.bsky.social
It's really variable in incidence. Do you use ACF/proximal cannulae? Or maybe you give the propofol really slowly via a 3-way tap? Problem is you don't know they'll have it until they have it, hence my routine use of lidocaine. bmcanesthesiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
Characteristics that increase the risk for pain on propofol injection - BMC Anesthesiology
Background Propofol for anesthesia has become increasingly popular for endoscopic procedures. However, pain on propofol injection (POPI) remains an issue with administration. The primary endpoint of this study was to identify patient characteristics and factors, such as IV site and gauge, that could predict the occurrence of POPI. Methods This was a prospective chart review study of 291 patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. The patient’s demographics, intravenous (IV) site, and gauge were extrapolated. POPI was scored 0–3: 0 for no pain, 1 for minimal discomfort or awareness of sensation, 2 for discomfort but manageable/tolerable, and 3 for severe discomfort with writhing. Results 291 patient charts were reviewed. One patient was excluded for a lower extremity IV site. 225 (77.6%) had no pain, 48 (16.6%) grade 1 pain, 16 (5.5%) grade 2 pain, and 1 (0.3%) grade 3 pain. 137, 13, and 140 patients respectively had antecubital (AC), forearm, and hand IVs. Zero patients with an AC IV experienced a score greater than 1. Compared to AC, forearm IVs with pain of 2–3 had a univariate odds ratio (OR) of 11.3 (0.66,1.92; p-value < 0.001), and hand IVs had a univariate OR of 18.8 (2.46,143.3; p-value < 0.001) with a multivariable OR 15.2 (1.93,118.9; p-value 0.004). Patients with anxiety/depression and pain had a univariate OR 2.31 (1.09, 7.27; p-value 0.031) with a multivariable OR 2.85 (1.06, 7.74; p-value 0.039). SSRI/SNRI use had a univariate OR 1.56 (0.57,4.28; p-value 0.38). Alcohol use had a univariate OR 1.24 (0.39,3.91; p-value 0.71). Narcotic use had a Univariate OR 6.18 (1.49,25.6; p-value 0.012). Diabetic patients had a univariate OR of 1.42 (0.45,4.48; p-value 0.55). Chronic pain had a univariate OR of 3.11 (1.04,9.28; p-value 0.042). Females had a univariate OR 0.98 (0.37,2.63; p-value 0.95). Conclusion This study identified potential characteristics for having POPI. The incidence of POPI was statistically significant in patients with hand and forearm IVs compared to AC IV sites, larger IV gauges, history of depression/anxiety, history of chronic narcotic use, fibromyalgia, and chronic pain syndromes. This shows the potential of premedicating with analgesics or using AC sites on these select patients to help reduce the risk of POPI.
bmcanesthesiol.biomedcentral.com
intensiveperson.bsky.social
I use it almost routinely to prevent propofol injection pain, and very occasionally intra-op (still reduces post-op opioid requirement a little), but safety concerns around post-op infusions are very much warranted - renal function can be dynamic and accumulation/LAST can develop quickly.
intensiveperson.bsky.social
My favourite bang-for-buck intervention is pre-warming the operating table/trolley (especially if there's a gel pad) with a Bair hugger (just tubing under a drawsheet, so no additional consumables). Got sick of seeing people instantly drop a degree from lying, bare-backed, on a cold surface.
Reposted by Pete Hart
catanita.bsky.social
The amazing team at @sciencevs.bsky.social dropped a #Tylenol podcast a few days ago, giving explanation of why the link has been made and how it's not quite as it seems
A great example of bias and confounding, and how meta-analysis isn't always the pinnacle of evidence
#EpiSky #MedSky
Does Tylenol Cause Autism?
Podcast Episode · Science Vs · 09/18/2025 · 28m
podcasts.apple.com
intensiveperson.bsky.social
I would like to propose that this incident is not representative of UK anaesthetic practice. Lancashire anaesthetic practice, maybe...
intensiveperson.bsky.social
(There is some good stuff in here as well, reinforcing appropriate device selection - we have a long way to go in typical UK hospital practice - and advising against routine correction of coagulopathy for low-risk insertions.) (3/2)
intensiveperson.bsky.social
...delayed. This is worrying when there are countless incidents of arterial CVCs not being recognised on CXR, and when we now know that delayed recognition is associated with increased risk of harm. It also means the guidelines are yet again lagging behind most people's practice. (2/2)
intensiveperson.bsky.social
This has been a long time coming. However, there is a, bizarre lack of emphasis (as in 2016) on confirmation of venous placement, with plenty of words dedicated to tip positioning on CXR and only one reference to pressure transduction (seemingly as a preliminary check where the CXR will be (1/2)
anaesjournal.bsky.social
Should you request a PICC, a tunnelled CVC or a midline for your patient?

What factors should influence your choice of vascular access device?

#AnSky #MedSky

doi.org/10.1111/anae...
intensiveperson.bsky.social
.. multiple large CVC studies show no apparent strokes or deaths due to arterial injury, because they weren't defined complications. (2/2)
intensiveperson.bsky.social
It's great to have some data on emergent prehospital trauma line insertion, and clearly it's reasonable/inevitable to accept a higher complication rate in this setting. You do need to take care comparing complication rates between studies, as definitions vary widely. For example (1/2)
intensiveperson.bsky.social
Just a little too late for last week's #MedSkyDebate! Look forward to digging into this... Thanks to @medicluke.bsky.social for sharing it.
anaesjournal.bsky.social
Pre-hospital placement of a large-calibre central venous catheter can be a life-saving measure.

The insertion site attempted most frequently was the right subclavian vein using a landmark-guided technique.

#AnSky #MedSky

doi.org/10.1111/anae...
intensiveperson.bsky.social
You only need the tourniquet inflated while there's muscle relaxant circulating, you'd only need to reinflate if you redose.
intensiveperson.bsky.social
Indeed - which is why people need to decide if they're okay with this "obeying" (and not really knowing whether they're conscious without recall) or if they think this is verboten (and then presumably doing something to make sure it's not happening?)
Reposted by Pete Hart
georgeclews.bsky.social
If you wanted to minimise risk of awareness, we could give our patients enough anaesthesia to be at near burst suppression, but then what would be the NNT and what harms would we cause from this?
intensiveperson.bsky.social
..unpleasant experience (without recall)" is that it's wishful thinking that your patients will have one but not the other - without IFT/recall you have no way of knowing. You can take option 1.5 - you accept not-unpleasant awareness w/o recall but you guess at preventing anything worse. (3/3)
intensiveperson.bsky.social
..level of consciousness/awareness. Being a number 1 doesn't mean you're happy with *any* level of awareness without recall, just that you accept there may be (if you looked for it) some level of awareness under your GAs. The problem with saying "I'm fine with obeying commands but not with an (2/3)
intensiveperson.bsky.social
I agree that the crux here is the definition of awareness, and for most of us that word denotes an awful conscious experience which - as you say - I would not consent to having even if amnesia was guaranteed. However I think most people also accept that IFT responsiveness must indicate some(1/3)
intensiveperson.bsky.social
Like I say, you've got to pick one of the 4.5 positions. For now, I've decided I won't do IFT because I don't actually mind about responsiveness as long as (in Pandit's words, via @ncglasses.bsky.social), the (final) experience is acceptable to the patient.
intensiveperson.bsky.social
Yep that's fair as an option 3.5 - is that what you do? I guess in this debate I'm trying to highlight the unknowability of our patients' conscious levels and hoping to shift a few number 4s to number 1 or 2. I'm with JJ Pandit and so I'm genuinely a number 1.