inyoung at 4S🎡
@inyoungcheong.bsky.social
🌇 postdoc, princeton center for information technology policy,
💁🏻 previously uw husky, un, acus, south korean government
🥁 ai ethics, safety, and policy
https://inyoungcheong.github.io
💁🏻 previously uw husky, un, acus, south korean government
🥁 ai ethics, safety, and policy
https://inyoungcheong.github.io
Sign-up form: forms.gle/B4seVeCsSfhV...
Sign Up Form for Qualitative Interview Study
We are a team of researchers from the POLARIS Lab at the Princeton University. We are running an interview study to better understand the workflow of public defenders and identify how AI tools can ass...
forms.gle
April 15, 2025 at 8:42 PM
Sign-up form: forms.gle/B4seVeCsSfhV...
Reposted by inyoung at 4S🎡
A lot of underlying stuff holds:
Devlin, K. (2024). Relating with Social Robots: Issues of Sex, Love, Intimacy, Emotion, Attachment, and Companionship. In A. Edwards, & L. Fortunati (Eds.), The De Gruyter Handbook of Robots in Society and Culture (pp. 277-294).
kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/pu...
Devlin, K. (2024). Relating with Social Robots: Issues of Sex, Love, Intimacy, Emotion, Attachment, and Companionship. In A. Edwards, & L. Fortunati (Eds.), The De Gruyter Handbook of Robots in Society and Culture (pp. 277-294).
kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/pu...
Relating with Social Robots: Issues of Sex, Love, Intimacy, Emotion, Attachment, and Companionship
kclpure.kcl.ac.uk
April 3, 2025 at 9:03 AM
A lot of underlying stuff holds:
Devlin, K. (2024). Relating with Social Robots: Issues of Sex, Love, Intimacy, Emotion, Attachment, and Companionship. In A. Edwards, & L. Fortunati (Eds.), The De Gruyter Handbook of Robots in Society and Culture (pp. 277-294).
kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/pu...
Devlin, K. (2024). Relating with Social Robots: Issues of Sex, Love, Intimacy, Emotion, Attachment, and Companionship. In A. Edwards, & L. Fortunati (Eds.), The De Gruyter Handbook of Robots in Society and Culture (pp. 277-294).
kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/pu...
More than deserved! 🤩
February 20, 2025 at 5:47 PM
More than deserved! 🤩
Great development from your Listener's Choice article. I like this institutional approach a lot! Thanks for your scholarship. Looking forward to deeper reading! 😀
February 19, 2025 at 7:54 PM
Great development from your Listener's Choice article. I like this institutional approach a lot! Thanks for your scholarship. Looking forward to deeper reading! 😀
This "independency" from the President could be confusing. Why do they have special discretion compared to other secretaries? The answer is, because they didn't want the President to have rulemaking and enforcement power in the first place, which should've been preserved to Congress and courts. 3/n
February 19, 2025 at 7:45 PM
This "independency" from the President could be confusing. Why do they have special discretion compared to other secretaries? The answer is, because they didn't want the President to have rulemaking and enforcement power in the first place, which should've been preserved to Congress and courts. 3/n
However, the US has pioneered multi-headed agency models, since the early 1900s, because they didn't trust one-person in so much power especially when it makes the rules on private businesses. Multi-headed system keeps a distance from the President so that they have room for deliberation. 2/n
February 19, 2025 at 7:40 PM
However, the US has pioneered multi-headed agency models, since the early 1900s, because they didn't trust one-person in so much power especially when it makes the rules on private businesses. Multi-headed system keeps a distance from the President so that they have room for deliberation. 2/n