Ian Sammis
@isammis.bsky.social
330 followers 140 following 3K posts
Low-level tech peon; I've also physicsed, written, mathed, and arted for food.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
isammis.bsky.social
At least one thing down here ISN'T total shit!

🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

😭
isammis.bsky.social
Governmental models can't run by themselves; people have to abide by them. We're in the catastrophic position that the Republicans are ignoring the rules, the SC is saying there are no rules, and the media are lying at worst or acting like reporting on the rule-breaking would be rude at best.
isammis.bsky.social
These are the feeblest "tough guys" ever. My dudes, you're wearing an entire surplus store's worth of cosplay tactical gear. What exactly do you need to be protected from? Priests? Old ladies saying mean things?
isammis.bsky.social
The weird thing about the collapse of the US’s constitutional order is that it felt very abrupt from the inside, but when I try to write it up as a narrative I find myself starting with something like Ford’s pardon of Nixon in 1974.
a man in a suit and tie is looking down with his eyes closed
Alt: Gerald Ford making a speech.
media.tenor.com
isammis.bsky.social
time drumming up opposition. Fortunately for all of us, they’re all wearing surplus store cosplay NGO mercenary outfits, which don’t really scream “POLICE” to anyone. /2
isammis.bsky.social
At any rate, “let’s go confront the police,” is an instinct that American has been ruthlessly suppressing for decades. That said; this is one place where “Trump is an idiot” is paying off—if he’d outfitted ICE with shiny blue uniforms with patches and pleats, we’d have a much harder /1
isammis.bsky.social
A second problem is that the US _already_ has authoritarian tendencies — for half a century we’ve had an incarceration rate four times that of a typical European country, and police officers had near legal impunity before Trump.
isammis.bsky.social
It’s fine. He said OpSec Is Clean, which is how he tries to cast Turn Reporter.
isammis.bsky.social
It is really strange watching this whole group rant endlessly about strength while apparently having no idea what strength is for.

If you’re not protecting people, you’re not strong.
isammis.bsky.social
I normally warn Canadians not to visit for now, but the RCAF is probably going to be fine. Welcome to California.

sfstandard.com/2025/10/01/s...
Canadians and civilian volunteer pilots will save Fleet Week
Thank you, Canada 🫡
sfstandard.com
isammis.bsky.social
He isn’t popular. The only reason things are still reasonably peaceful is that the majority of Americans expect that the 2026 and 2028 elections will happen as per normal, and that things won’t get “too bad” (for some interpretation) in the meanwhile.

If that changes things will get terrible, fast.
isammis.bsky.social
In the same speech he’s starting to throw around the word insurrection. If he invokes the Insurrection Act all bets are off—he _could_ use the NG for “policing”—but it’s meant in the sense of “of conquered territory.”

That would be “legal.” It would also destroy the US, forever.
isammis.bsky.social
Wish I could disagree.
isammis.bsky.social
Oh, I know, and I'm sorry. This is one of my private rage buttons, because I can't get other Americans to _see_ it. We're sitting around glowing a sort of nuclear apocalypse red on incarceration rate graphs, and people just sort of slide across it and don't see a problem.
isammis.bsky.social
"Now?"

Have you _seen_ our incarceration rate?

(It's literally six times that of Canada.)

We've been dehumanizing Americans since Reagan. This is about the only part of all this that _isn't_ new.
isammis.bsky.social
No, of course not. But you appear to be doing just that with your “remarkable stance” language.

It’s a shift in messaging because Trump has switched from free trade to high and semi-random tariffs. It’s not a “remarkable stance” if you have to defend the same policy from a novel attack.
isammis.bsky.social
And yes, you were calling them hypocrites.
isammis.bsky.social
“It’s a pretty remarkable stance for a party that hasn’t always been high on removing barriers to trade, focusing instead on protecting American workers.”

Opposing stupid, randomly assigned tariffs isn’t a remarkable stance for a party that wanted different tariffs for a different reason.
isammis.bsky.social
It was the end of him among sane Americans.

Unfortunately we don’t even hold a popular majority, much less an electoral one.
isammis.bsky.social
Doesn’t help that we have just enough guys like Polis that they have an easy time selling their bullshit.
isammis.bsky.social
Gotta love that Politico slant, too:

DEMOCRATS: We should set tariffs to make sure we don’t end up in a race to the bottom on worker’s rights.

TRUMP: Yes, we should set tariffs by asking an LLM what they should be!

DEMOCRATS: No, that’s stupid.

POLITICO: You hypocrites used to like tariffs.
isammis.bsky.social
I've always found people who say things like that deeply suspect, because what they mean is that they found their economic outlook under Obama troubling but the same outlook under Trump in 2017-2019 much better.

Somehow I don't think that this is actually about economics. Racism was the point.
isammis.bsky.social
Integrity and, apparently, memory. That was never true.

Even in his first administration all he managed to do was _not_ destroy the economy he'd inherited from Obama for 3 years, until COVID.

This time around, of course, he felt emboldened, and wrecked everything in about a month.
isammis.bsky.social
Anyway, sorry to pontificate. It’s… very easy to get discouraged, and it’ll get worse before it gets better. But we can’t comply. Anything is better than that.