Wanska Cęwaniasz
banner
ivanscat1.bsky.social
Wanska Cęwaniasz
@ivanscat1.bsky.social
🕸️ 🧩
You should probably find better spaces to publish this stuff than evil Elsevier journals
November 7, 2025 at 4:03 PM
Nice, das klingt doch sehr vernünftig.
Vielleicht schaffen wir es doch noch abzuwenden das Europa eine digitale Kolonie wird!
November 7, 2025 at 3:59 PM
That is very sad for you. However I am not sure whether "I was just doing my job. Even if it made me feel uncomfortable." Is the greatest justification of all time. Everybody has a little bit of agency.
November 4, 2025 at 3:23 PM
But you will just do it. For your personal reputation gain. As academics always have given in to literally all immoral demands of the publishing industry.
November 4, 2025 at 7:10 AM
Fetter Mann means fat man in German, which makes him even sound like a weird or evil character from a Gebrüder Grimm Märchen.
October 15, 2025 at 3:53 PM
We have structured data in an SQL database and know we are to make this into a "RAG chatbot", no matter how much we pleaded against it.
Embedding tabular data is most likely a complete waste of time, but i mean they pay for our time, so whatever.
October 6, 2025 at 5:27 PM
One negative thing I noticed about 4.5 is that it feels like it does a lot more of "you are absolutely right! Let me ..." than the previous Sonnet version.
Maybe that stuff helps in the LMarena ratings.
October 4, 2025 at 2:59 PM
I actually like this one more than the videos!
October 1, 2025 at 3:21 PM
This will work nicely on painkillers: m.imdb.com/title/tt1822...
Colin from Accounts (TV Series 2022– ) ⭐ 8.1 | Comedy, Drama, Romance
27m | TV-MA
m.imdb.com
September 25, 2025 at 4:56 PM
Public Possession is a part of this as well? Just embarrassing 😳
September 19, 2025 at 12:15 PM
Im Endeffekt ist außer für Rentenerhöhungen und Steuergeschenke an die Gastronomie halt für nix Geld da.
Für diese Prioritäten von SPD und CSU muss man Verständnis haben!
September 18, 2025 at 3:58 PM
They literally give away all the rights to their papers to the publishing industry without a second thought for personal reputational gain. But when the public wants access to said research that is funded with public money they see a problem.
That can't be taken seriously.
September 7, 2025 at 7:43 AM
Wenn man auf Bluesky nach dem Film sucht bekommt man reihenweise genau die Kommentare die das Gegenstück zu diesem "Statement" darstellen.

Perfekt für alle Beteiligten. Für die einen Virtue Signaling an die Blase und für Bully die Darstellung als mutiger Künstler. Bei völliger Belanglosigkeit.
August 20, 2025 at 7:28 PM
Still. Currently, the US is not a safe destination for anyone outside. So if you want to include the rest of the world, your conference should be in a country with less authoritarian immigration agencies.
July 19, 2025 at 5:43 PM
Unfortunately, they might just ask another AI to do this task for them.
March 31, 2025 at 4:58 PM
As long as scientists value the prestige derived from handing over all rights to for-profit publishers more than anything else, this is to expected.
This could quite easily be avoided by not signing agreements with these companies.
March 28, 2025 at 11:19 AM
If you get government funds, the result should be openly licensed. Everything else would be deeply immoral.
If you want to keep your research private, you should get private funding.
March 21, 2025 at 10:36 PM
Sorry, you are right. My reaction was too heated and over the top and not constructive at all. Will delete
March 8, 2025 at 6:38 PM
I think explicitly qualitative research is much more intellectually honest than a lot of quantitative research where the data is mainly necessary to increase prestige of otherwise completely implausible hypotheses.
March 8, 2025 at 4:08 PM
May depend on the field but in our social psychology realms literally every PhD student has encountered something like this: www.theorgplumber.com/posts/statem...
In private nobody denies that the majority of the field is not reproducible, we just haggle about which parts.
A Post Mortem on the Gino Case | The Organizational Plumber
My perspective on the Gino-Ariely scandal, and what we should learn from it.
www.theorgplumber.com
March 8, 2025 at 4:03 PM
Es sollte einfacher werden solche Leute zu feuern.
March 8, 2025 at 12:20 PM
Das interessante an R1 ist nicht die Weboberfläche, sondern das es Open Weights veröffentlicht ist und es ein Paper dazu gibt, dass das Vorgehen beschreibt.
January 31, 2025 at 4:23 PM
Kleine Unschärfe: Das betrifft nicht um das Sprachmodell, sondern das über die Website erreichbare System. Die abgebildete Zensur ist regelbasiert über die Chatoberfläche gelegt. Wenn man das Sprachmodell in eigener Infrastruktur oder über Anbieter außerhalb Chinas ansteuert, tritt das nicht auf.
January 31, 2025 at 4:15 PM