These approaches should build on foundations of trust, accessibility, and inclusion to involve diverse and underrepresented communities.

Congrats to the authorship team, particularly Catherine Shuttleworth who led the paper and Lauren Bell for seeing it over the line!

In those studies, a number of approaches were used. Mainly, these were forms of participatory approaches, but we also identified examples of Delphi exercises, a super-setting approach, a nominal group technique, a deliberative exercise, and a modified James Lind Alliance process being used.

We found 18 studies that had examples of priority setting around the wider determinants of health and involved local communities in research or intervention prioritisation.

I'm starting to agree with you on this! Most active, and probably most interesting in terms of the extra engagement that happens on there

P.s.: caption competition for my stern look at a malfunctioning microphone?

My main takeaway reflection from the conference - as researchers, to what extent should we be acting as advocates (or even activists?) for 1) what our research finds and 2) the policy implications of that research?