for how it still aligns with the official story. while the official story's strongest points are much harder to explain away. I think this gets lost in focusing on less important details. But ofc I know many would disagree it's that simple. Thanks again, just sharing my perspective. 7/7

Same with me not knowing any other explanation for the sudden head movement forward between 312 and 313. I realize I'm kind of ranting here now. In the end my experience is when you line up the strongest points on both sides, the conspiracy ones all have reasonable explanations 6/?

so it's totally believable to me that the witnesses got it wrong because it's counterintuitive. For the head wound: I think it's clear on the Z film that there is no huge gaping wound on the back of the president's head. And I know no good rebuttal to that unless the whole thing is doctored. 5/?

still exists and really does LOOK like it was shot in the front by a bullet, the outer pane is cracked but the inner isn't. As far as I know no one actually "put a pencil through it". A crack on the outside is possible due to a collision on the inside: www.youtube.com/watch?v=A451... 4/?

Where, on the other hand, points about a bullet hole existing coming through the front windshield or an exit wound on the back of the president's head directly contradicts the official story. Why I don't buy those is I think the evidence on the other side is stronger. Re: the windshield it 3/?

than to present a lot of different points. And by strongest I don't just mean facts that are solid I mean the things that directly pit the official story against an alternative. For instance, a police officer lying about a train blocking his line of sight could just be him covering his ass 2/?

I appreciate your responses. I took a look and watched this video. I feel like there are so many details and claims related to the assassination that it's easy to tell many different stories as to what actually happened. So I think the focus is better spent going deeper on the strongest evidence 1/?

Not to mention in the frames after 312 you can see the blood/brain matter being shot out to the front of him and the fact you can see the huge wound at the front of his head. An exit wound will be much larger than the entry wound.

Take a look at the individual film frames. The president is struck in the head between frames 312 and 313. What direction does the bullet move his head? Only later do muscle spasms or a jet effect move his head backward.

www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/

www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzyw...

What's the strongest piece of evidence in your mind against the lone gunman theory?

I’m not an expert by any means but would gladly give my 2c on any of your points above.

Forget 1000. Try picking the top 3 or 4 most convincing pieces of evidence to you and try looking at what the strongest counterarguments are. Give the other side a fair shake. You will walk away thinking they aren’t that convincing after all.

Also doubles as sounding a bit like a short bulletin

I've seen "bolts" suggested. As in "a bolt from the blue(sky)"