Jarek Duda
@jarekduda.bsky.social
Physicist (PhD), computer scientist (PhD), assistant professor at Jagiellonian University, known for ANS coding (used by e.g. Linux kernel, JPEG XL)
Articles: http://th.if.uj.edu.pl/~dudaj/
Articles: http://th.if.uj.edu.pl/~dudaj/
And what would be the color of white hole?
February 14, 2026 at 3:31 PM
And what would be the color of white hole?
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be really certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various observational suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various observational suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
February 14, 2026 at 11:11 AM
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be really certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various observational suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various observational suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
Congratulations!
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be really certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making LISA even more interesting.
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be really certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making LISA even more interesting.
February 14, 2026 at 5:20 AM
Congratulations!
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be really certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making LISA even more interesting.
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be really certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making LISA even more interesting.
Congratulations!
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be really certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be really certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
February 14, 2026 at 5:18 AM
Congratulations!
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be really certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be really certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
February 14, 2026 at 2:47 AM
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
February 14, 2026 at 2:47 AM
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
February 14, 2026 at 2:46 AM
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
February 14, 2026 at 2:46 AM
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
As they usually lack retarded EM counterpart, can we be certain give event is retarded (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
February 14, 2026 at 2:45 AM
As they usually lack retarded EM counterpart, can we be certain give event is retarded (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
February 14, 2026 at 2:43 AM
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
February 14, 2026 at 2:42 AM
As it didn't have retarded EM counterpart, can we be certain it was retarded event (not advanced)?
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.
Both are mathematically allowed, and there are various suggestions LIGO sees both (e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/2512.20692 ) - making it even more interesting.