6/6
If you’re interested in the full story, check out the paper here: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.250061

Big thanks to @SaulinAnne , Yuqing Zhou, and @Hein_Lab for the joint effort and to @RTG2660 for providing an excellent research environment!

5/6
In short:
💡 Rewards can encourage approach toward out-groups
❌ But they don’t easily alter underlying impressions

This highlights both the promise and limits of non-social reinforcers in reducing social intergroup biases.

4/6
Our key findings:
- An initial in-group bias in approach behaviour and impression ratings ✅
- Rewarding out-group approach reduced this bias ✅
- People learned more from rewards than punishments ✅
- But… impressions of the out-group remained unchanged ❎

3/6
We ran three #preregistered online studies using a new #approach-avoidance learning task:
➡️ Participants moved a manikin towards or away from symbols (representing members of their in-group or out-group) and earned money depending on their choices.

Would rewards shift biases?

2/6
In a #social #intergroup context, humans often show #in-group biases:
- More likely to approach
- More positive impressions of
individuals from their own group compared to others.

But can #learning from external rewards/punishments reduce these biases?

🥳 Super excited that today the first paper of my PhD has been published in
Royal Society Open Science: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.250061

Can learning from rewards and punishments change how people approach (or avoid) in-group vs. out-group members?

Read the thread below! 🧵 1/6

Meta will ihre KI mit euren Daten trainieren. Bis zum 26. Mai ist Widerspruch möglich.
Das geht sehr einfach mit ein paar klicks.
Danke @netzpolitik_feed und @roofjoke

https://netzpolitik.org/2025/meta-ki-jetzt-widersprechen-oder-fuer-immer-schweigen/

#meta […]

[Original post on chaos.social]

I think it's going to be more important than ever that #mastodon and the #fediverse are not centrally operated out of the US like almost every other social media platform out there.