Trumps two super powers are that he has zero capacity for shame and he does NOT over estimate the general intelligence and knowledge of the American people.

Please forgive us. Our president’s mother took Tylenol when she was pregnant.

Great metaphor but shouldn’t it be Ms. Now

Who might that be?

One of the many things I despise about Trump is that he leads me to rethink my previously negative views of some people in the public arena.

Trump’s DOJ investigating the Epstein situation is a case of dog chasing the car, turning into dog driving car.

I completely agree with Kevin and Tom Nichols. In particular, Kevin’s polite and clear message is an example of what I wish for in this platform. However, the vitriol to his original post is the liberal version of Twitter and not a good sign for the future of the platform.

Like making love in a canoe - fvcking close to water.

Musk has already demonstrated, on the global stage an inability to be guided by principles core to American long-term interests. Why should the Democratic Party trust Musk beyond any momentary spate he currently expresses?

Another phrase is Clerical Fascism - en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clerica...

It is a disappointment, but not like Jojo states. I watched Biden’s prez debate and was horrified. It seems that Trapper tries to explain what went wrong before and after. I was profoundly sadden of Trump’s re-election and Dems must to be honest as to their own shortcomings and what went wrong.

It’s almost as if Trump misses the good old days of COVID chaos.

I wonder if the Cardinals during their papal conclave will take a tip from Trump admin. and use the Signal app. rather than the Sistine Chapel chimney?

Jesus don’t throw gutter balls!

Agree and continuing to recycle the idea that Dems didn’t properly disclose isn’t helpful! The other side doesn’t fester with past failures and is something some Dems could learn from.

This SNAFU is characteristic of the culture created by the top executive. Same pattern happens in the corporate world. Two things to worry about are future reoccurrences of similar events and what goes unreported.

Thank you for your thoughtful reply. Another thing is Mika’s troubling habit of undercutting her guests. For example, when introducing Ezra’s book, after reading its chapter titles, she says “it’s obvious this book is written by a couple of boys.” This doesn’t elevate the discussion and program.

I’d prefer more reasoned discussion and informed debate over pointless passion. IMHO Mika doesn’t have the gravitas to carry on a discussion with these guests and uses emotional expression as a crutch.