Jayashree Rajagopalan
@jayash-r.bsky.social
Reposted by Jayashree Rajagopalan
“Bluesky is much better for science. There is much less toxicity, misinformation, and distractions,” wrote one respondent. “My feed is almost entirely scientists and I actually get updates on research that is relevant and timely,” wrote another.
#ScienceSky #AcademicSky
#ScienceSky #AcademicSky
Bluesky’s science takeover: 70% of Nature poll respondents use platform
Roughly 6,000 readers answered our poll, with many declaring that Bluesky was nicer, kinder and less antagonistic to science than X.
www.nature.com
January 24, 2025 at 4:25 PM
“Bluesky is much better for science. There is much less toxicity, misinformation, and distractions,” wrote one respondent. “My feed is almost entirely scientists and I actually get updates on research that is relevant and timely,” wrote another.
#ScienceSky #AcademicSky
#ScienceSky #AcademicSky
Reposted by Jayashree Rajagopalan
Fascinating panel at #APE2025, chaired by @rschon.bsky.social, on rethinking scholarly outputs, discussing the role publishers and journals play in storytelling in research outputs. Important comment by @rouhiroo.bsky.social on the risks of just depositing machine readable data without context.
January 14, 2025 at 12:59 PM
Fascinating panel at #APE2025, chaired by @rschon.bsky.social, on rethinking scholarly outputs, discussing the role publishers and journals play in storytelling in research outputs. Important comment by @rouhiroo.bsky.social on the risks of just depositing machine readable data without context.